Return-Path: <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g0TJV1n24931; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 14:31:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 14:31:12 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <NFBBJBDNALBFFABFAMINKENDCAAA.dlmsmith@msn.com> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: "Debra Morris Smith" <dlmsmith@msn.com> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-ESL:7072] how you got this message X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; Status: O Content-Length: 1874 Lines: 53 Lately this discussion group has become a public venue for sort of a private conversation that evolved from a group topic. Probably the slide from public to private and back to public has interesting rhetorical or sociolinguistic implications, but I would just like to make the practical suggestion that everyone be a little more aware that hitting "reply" means what you say goes to all subscribers and that what's on the subject line should reflect what's in the message. To reply to an individual, you can copy and paste that person's e-mail address into the 'to' line of your message. I would be curious to know if the person who reported his statistical analysis of the NIFL lists' activity levels a few weeks ago is following up on the critiques of his findings by monitoring message content and relevance. Debbie Smith -----Original Message----- From: nifl-esl@nifl.gov [mailto:nifl-esl@nifl.gov]On Behalf Of Crownsville Patient Education Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 8:23 AM To: Multiple recipients of list Subject: [NIFL-ESL:7066] Re: voiced/unvoiced -th- minimal pair I'm very curious as to how I received your message. I just signed up for the NIFL-ESL discussion group and received verification of my application, followed by your message to "Andres." That must account for it. The mention of the voiced/unvoiced minimal pair /th/ brought back fond memories of working on my masters in linguistics. Jerry Peterson ABE teacher Crownsville Hospital Center Crownsville, Maryland <<< ujwalasamant@hotmail.com 1/29 9:11a >>> Andres, I sort of thought Kathleen and you might well be connected, but having made a mega gaffe by 'assuming' that was the case elsewhere, I decided to play it safe. cheers Ujwala _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:43:58 EST