[NIFL-ESL:8000] Re: Whole language

From: AWilder106@aol.com
Date: Mon Sep 16 2002 - 13:34:11 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g8GHYBX08550; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 13:34:11 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 13:34:11 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <18f.e2f54ed.2ab76f37@aol.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: AWilder106@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-ESL:8000] Re: Whole language
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Mac - Post-GM sub 146
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Status: O
Content-Length: 342
Lines: 14

Dear Marie,

Please excuse me, but I am still a little bit confused.

I know (I think) that a phoneme is the smallest sound unit.

I also think that phonics must be quite a lot larger than this in definition, 
at least in the way Charles Jannuzi has been using it.

Thank you very much for the book citations, they will be useful.

Andrea

 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:44:20 EST