[NIFL-ESL:8382] Re: Grammar question

From: Barbara Dorsett (barbsesl@worldpath.net)
Date: Thu Dec 12 2002 - 12:23:38 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id gBCHNcX14890; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:23:38 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:23:38 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <009a01c2a201$fc0a5dc0$2bdc85d0@5a2e4>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Barbara Dorsett" <barbsesl@worldpath.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-ESL:8382] Re: Grammar question
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
Status: O
Content-Length: 1322
Lines: 36

Lorraine:  In my opinion, that sentence DOES have correct parallelism,
because "enjoy" takes verbs in the gerund after it, and you have gerundial
forms in all three objects of the sentence:  snow skiing, going, and water
skiing.  It's just that the student doesn't "see" it that way.  If you
wanted each object to "look" the same, you might try:  enjoy going snow
skiing, going to baseball games, and going water skiing.  However, I feel
that the original sentence would be the more common way to express the idea.

Barbara Dorsett, ESOL Dept. Head
Dover Adult Learning Center
Dover, NH
----- Original Message -----
From: Lorraine Dutton
To: Multiple recipients of list
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 11:15 AM
Subject: [NIFL-ESL:8372] Grammar question


Hi all!

I have a student who is working on parallel structure, and one of the
sentences she encountered in her lesson is as follows:

The Bensons enjoy snow skiing in the winter, going to baseball games in the
spring, and water skiing in the summer.

This sentence has faulty parallelism because "going to baseball games" is a
different structure from the other two elements in the sentence. My question
is, how could you fix this sentence and still keep the original idea intact?
I'm drawing a blank....

Let me know your ideas!

Lorraine Dutton
lad-oh@etop.org



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:44:30 EST