Return-Path: <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id iB6Ml3H08243; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 17:47:03 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 17:47:03 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <BDDB0D13.101B2%applepie@minos.ocn.ne.jp> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: $B9b66!!H~DE;R( <applepie@minos.ocn.ne.jp> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-ESL:10635] listening and grammar correlation X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Status: RO Content-Length: 301 Lines: 17 Dear all, Could anyone direct me to the online research papers on the correlation between listening comprehension and grammar instruction? Benefit and disadvantage? Also I would appreciate any information on grammar and extensive reading, and grammar and composition. Thank you Mitsuko Japan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 23 2004 - 09:46:56 EST