Return-Path: <nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id fBBEln005864; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:47:49 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:47:49 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <001d01c18253$0992da00$6a01a8c0@BROOME> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: "Colleen Cline" <ccline@bccdc.net> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-FAMILY:492] Re: Family Literacy Curriculums X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; Status: O Content-Length: 1426 Lines: 31 It seems that a lot of people are frusterated over the fact that people seem to be "advertising" on this list. I did post a message requesting the information on curriculum. My apologies to all who are angry. When I signed on to this list a couple of weeks ago I did not receive a book of instructions/rules. The way our system works is that yesterday's posts were sent out this morning. My question is this: If you people are getting so angry and frusterated about a simple mistake from an educator who is trying ONLY to help people, what happens to you when you actually have to teach someone how to read? Perhaps this is not the forum for me - does anyone know how I can be removed from this list? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Janna Youngs" <Janna_Youngs@sad40.k12.me.us> To: "Multiple recipients of list" <nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 8:45 AM Subject: [NIFL-FAMILY:488] Re: Family Literacy Curriculums > I am really frustrated with participants of this list serve posting > messages to the list rather than to the individual directly, especially > when the monitor just put out FYI regarding this very point. Going > through message after message that are for specific individuals (and not > for all) seems like an invasion of privacy. > > "If we open a quarrel between the past and the present, > we shall find we have lost the future." > > -Winston Churchill > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 11:27:48 EST