[NIFL-FAMILY:513] Re: Barriers to Family Literacy

From: Dana Eness (eness@leh.org)
Date: Wed Dec 12 2001 - 11:20:06 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id fBCGK6015222; Wed, 12 Dec 2001 11:20:06 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 11:20:06 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <01C182F6.AC54F860.eness@leh.org>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: Dana Eness <eness@leh.org>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-FAMILY:513] Re: Barriers to Family Literacy
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211
Status: O
Content-Length: 3011
Lines: 62

Kathleen,

 Like the program you describe, I work with a 2 hour per week, 6 to 8 week 
program held in libraries, schools and other public venues.    Our program 
is a lovely PACT adjunct to whatever more intensive literacy efforts are 
going on in the community (for example, our families are recruited from 
Head Start, ABE and ESL programs), and is held in the evenings or Saturday 
mornings. It is designed to help families bond around the act of reading, 
and to change attitudes and behaviors towards reading in non-readers or 
folks at the beginning-level stages of literacy.

It's interesting to see not only the thirst for family literacy programs on 
this list, but also the thirst for FAMILIES for time to spend together 
talking about meaningful issues  as presented in award-winning children's 
literature in a nurturing environment.  Through my involvement with this 
program, I realize that PACT time is really critical to the mental health 
of our nation's families regardless of their literacy levels.  I think, 
Kathleen, that the impact comes despite the dilution of contact hours with 
programs such as these, because when done right, families leave after those 
2 hours with so much food for thought that the reading and discussion among 
the family members continues through the week until the next meeting.

Dana

**********************************
Dana Eness, Assistant Director
PRIME TIME FAMILY READING TIME
Louisiana Endowment for the Humanities
Louisiana Humanities Center/Turners' Hall
938 Lafayette Street,  Suite 300
New Orleans, LA  70113

http://www.leh.org
Tel. 504-523-4352 Ext. 126   1-800-909-7990
Fax  504-529-2358      E-mail:   eness@leh.org


-----Original Message-----
From:	KathleenBombach@aol.com [SMTP:KathleenBombach@aol.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, December 11, 2001 3:37 PM
To:	Multiple recipients of list
Subject:	[NIFL-FAMILY:503] Re: Barriers to Family Literacy

A major barrier to participation is the need for employment and money. We 
usually do not identify employment as a barrier because employed parents 
generally opt out from the beginning and are not on our radar. But their 
families can receive the same benefits from family literacy--has anyone 
designed a program where the only (single parent) or both (two parent) 
parent(s) are employed? It goes against the construct  of family literacy 
programs, where intensity and duration are important predictors of impact 
and so are built in from the beginning.

I once developed an elementary school reading program that had far more 
impact than I ever imagined it would have. Our intent was to provide at 
four to eight hours of programming a week after school for children who 
were not reading (grades 2-6). Because so many parents signed their 
children up, it was reduced to two hours a week and included children from 
pre-school to 6th grade. I did not think that it would have much impact 
with that amount of dilution, but it surpassed what I anticipated from the 
4-8 hour model.
Kathleen Bombach



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 11:27:48 EST