Return-Path: <nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id fBECbO007381; Fri, 14 Dec 2001 07:37:24 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 07:37:24 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <NCBBKFFJMKFIFAGAFGNEKEPDCNAA.jlee@famlit.org> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: "Jon Lee" <jlee@famlit.org> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-FAMILY:520] RE: Curriculum responses X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; Status: O Content-Length: 961 Lines: 26 All I can say is WOW! Already ten responses with some very serious implications that we need to consider: Is a curriculum of any sort too limiting, and too limited? Are there other words that we could use; outcomes of teaching and learning; framework; curriculum guide; outline. (We may need our more scholarly members to provide some definitions to help us on our way with this question.) Sequential, step by step programs do not seem to fit the bill (I could not agree more!) Rather, ideas, the importance of integration, offers alternatives or extended learning activities, or a package that contains a student workbook, a teacher lesson plan book and a best practices journal with user's comments and additions? (Thanks to: Susanna Scott Suchak), materials/guides on integrating Adult Ed topics into the PACT time (Jan Delay) seem to fit the bill a little better. By the way these are your words! Please keep your insights and knowledge coming! Jon
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 11:27:48 EST