Return-Path: <nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g5QMi5X01095; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 18:44:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 18:44:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20020626154219.009dd170@mail.aracnet.com> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: Sylvan Rainwater <sylvan@cccchs.org> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-FAMILY:1203] Re: Assessment question X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Status: O Content-Length: 728 Lines: 20 At 06:10 PM 06/26/2002 -0400, Dianna Baycich wrote: >Hi All, >I'm working on a project and would be interested to know what you all see as >issues/concerns with assessment and/or evaluation in family literacy >programs. Any feedback you can give me would be most helpful. Here's one issue: you are assessing and evaluating both adults and children. And also families. Tracking is difficult, because of the complexity of the program. You have different teachers involved always, and sometimes collaborating agencies as well. Or are you talking just about adults? -------------------------------------------------------------- Sylvan Rainwater . sylvan@cccchs.org Clackamas County Children's Commission Portland, OR USA
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:41:06 EST