[NIFL-FAMILY:1776] Re: NIFL, research

From: AWilder106@aol.com
Date: Thu Jan 29 2004 - 17:03:12 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id i0TM3CI01066; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:03:12 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:03:12 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <7F431EC0.337274E1.0A349A3F@aol.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: AWilder106@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-FAMILY:1776] Re: NIFL, research
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0
Status: O
Content-Length: 1286
Lines: 9

Yes, all good research is "scientifically-based," meaning that there are standards to follow and certain criteria, like "valid" and "reliable." "Valid" and "reliable" must stand up to "threats to validity," which vary according to method. Valid = is this the right measure to test what you want;  reliable = can this be replicated. "Scientifically-based" has come to be, in my opinion, a rather shabby phrase to 1) impugn the motives of a researcher ahead of time, and to 2) suggest that the questioner is ignorant going into the discussion. 

The real hat trick is to use qualitative methods and turn them quantitative--makes offensive people choke.  You have to really know what you are doing, though. 

The point of research is prediction--another  way of reading entrails.  My dissertation was 100% qualitative, yet I  was able to predict the outcome of group behavior based on observation, interviews, and document research.  

As far as I'm concerned, the only way to get  a grip on this is to ask a person precisely what they mean when they use the term, then ask for examples and further definitions.  Nothing wrong with that, we're all educators. Ask for examples from their  own work if it comes  to that.  A real scholar will be delighted to share the information!

Andrea  



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 23 2004 - 09:47:04 EST