Return-Path: <nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id i0UMugI05863; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 17:56:42 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 17:56:42 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <6E277026.09D2C14F.0A349A3F@aol.com> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: AWilder106@aol.com To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-FAMILY:1780] Re: NIFL, research X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0 Status: O Content-Length: 549 Lines: 7 Folks, I guess I better try to get my thoughts on one post. The schema I outlined applied to all research, follow the schema and you have scientific research, qualitative and quantitative. If you took Shirley Brice's "Ways with Words," you could extrapolitate her research design. That is an ethnography. The schema I put out was used by me for my 100% qualitative research. It is a general schema. Dare I say one size fits all? In a single case study you can generalize to the literature on topic x--whatever topic you are studying. Andrea
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 23 2004 - 09:47:04 EST