[NIFL-FAMILY:1940] RE: difficult decisions

From: Sylvan Rainwater (sylvan@cccchs.org)
Date: Thu Sep 23 2004 - 18:51:40 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id i8NMpe808414; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:51:40 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:51:40 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <000301c4a1c1$550b23d0$1a01a8c0@cccchs.org>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Sylvan Rainwater" <sylvan@cccchs.org>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-family@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-FAMILY:1940] RE: difficult decisions
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510
Content-Type: text/plain;
Status: O
Content-Length: 2688
Lines: 52

Okay, I just re-read this -- always a good idea *before* you post, and it
comes off sounding more harsh than I intended. We do realize that helping
people actually participate in our program and prioritize attendance (which
is not always culturally familiar to people) is part of our mission, part of
helping folks transition to working successfully with other schools and also
getting jobs at some point. We do provide social services and help people
connect with community resources as part of what we do. We do accept people
into the program who don't have it all together yet in hopes that we can
work with them to help them put it all together at some point.

However, it is a judgment call as to when a family will require so much
social service support that they will be unable to benefit from educational
services at all. Family Literacy is a program that does require a certain
amount of stability in order to sustain consistent participation. We are
required to document educational gains, and if a family is in such a
position that they can't benefit from educational services, then it doesn't
make sense for us to attempt to serve them. With a long waiting list, we
prioritize based on need *plus* ability to participate meaningfully in the
program.

-------
Sylvan Rainwater  mailto:sylvan@cccchs.org
Program Manager Family Literacy
Clackamas Co. Children's Commission /  Head Start
Oregon City, OR  USA
 

-----Original Message-----
From: nifl-family@nifl.gov [mailto:nifl-family@nifl.gov] On Behalf Of Sylvan
Rainwater
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 9:13 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: [NIFL-FAMILY:1939] RE: difficult decisions

There is a fine line here between helping families transition to regular
attendance and putting time and energy toward something that is not really
our core mission in a way that it detracts from others who *are* ready to
take advantage of the services we offer. There is sometimes a level of chaos
in a family that makes it impossible for them to participate, whether from
drugs/alcohol, depression, sometimes severe domestic violence, etc. If they
can't participate, they can't really benefit from our program. If we put our
energy into social services as opposed to education, we are shorting
everyone.

Sure, we want to help everyone and make it all work for everyone. But
sometimes you have to say "enough." Certainly, refer to other agencies that
can be of help (if they exist) and/or advocate for such services to be
provided. I think, though, that we need to be careful to focus on what we
*can* do for the most people in a particular niche that we serve. There are
plenty of those, as our waiting list will attest.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 23 2004 - 09:47:08 EST