Return-Path: <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g04ERl001486; Fri, 4 Jan 2002 09:27:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 09:27:47 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <30.201657c8.2967152d@aol.com> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: AWilder106@aol.com To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-FOBASICS:480] Re: more on topics X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Mac - Post-GM sub 146 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Status: O Content-Length: 388 Lines: 9 Barb: There is a plethora of reading and ld evaluation instruments out there. I would be very interested in an annotated bibliography of the most valid and reliable ones. These would be evaluation instruments that can be used by teachers and administrators in classrooms and programs, NOT ones that require specialized clinical training to administer and analyze. Thanks. Andrea
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:45:52 EST