Return-Path: <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id h6TEuo725273; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 10:56:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 10:56:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <p05100300bb4c39ec442c@[128.148.147.35]> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: Janet Isserlis <Janet_Isserlis@Brown.edu> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-FOBASICS:748] discussion - theory to practice X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Status: O Content-Length: 702 Lines: 16 In thinking about promoting such discussion, I'm wondering if any of the NCSALL researchers might now, post-publications, have updates, or new questions about their original research -- how *have* their reports been utilized? How connected are those researchers to the ways in which their reports are (or aren't) taken up? How do the researchers feel about this connection to practice? Janet Isserlis >You can also pose questions to NCSALL researchers about their research >via this list, and ask Focus on Basics authors about the experiences >they have written about in their articles. We haven't been very >successful in promoting that kind of discussion, but we certainly >encourage it.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:16:57 EST