[NIFL-FOBASICS:888] RE: Managing Statistics/Teaching to

From: Jennifer Roloff (roloffje@gse.harvard.edu)
Date: Thu Dec 11 2003 - 13:15:06 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id hBBIF6m13867; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:15:06 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 13:15:06 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <web-3805556@gse.harvard.edu>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Jennifer Roloff" <roloffje@gse.harvard.edu>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-FOBASICS:888] RE: Managing Statistics/Teaching to
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.6c
Status: O
Content-Length: 4203
Lines: 103

You should be able to go to the NIFL website (www.nifl.gov) and click on Links, I believe. There 
should be something about the person to whom you should send your request. It's something like 
listproc@nifl.gov...
Good luck

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:37:07 -0500 (EST)
  "Le, Nhi" <Nhi.Le@pfizer.com> wrote:
>I've asked someone on this mailing list to give me more information on what
>this organization is; however he did not respond.
>
>How can I get off this mailing list?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Nixon S. Griffis [mailto:ngriffis@bellsouth.net]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 10:52 AM
>To: Multiple recipients of list
>Subject: [NIFL-FOBASICS:871] RE: Managing Statistics/Teaching to the
>test
>
>
>Welcome to the wonderful world of education Mr. Boone. Teaching to the test
>is more and more part of the curriculum by necessity for many teachers.
>
>Suggestion 1.	Duplicate each question couching that question in different
>forms. Make twenty examples of such a question. Then drill your students
>over and over again until each student is capable of answering that
>question. Math and language are the easiest to accomplish. Usage, grammar
>mechanics, math solutions are logical and can be set out in rule form.
>Reading is much more difficult because of the subtle skills needed to be
>developed over long terms of time in order to build comprehension and speed.
>See suggestion 2. for Reading. Oh yes, because you will have M(6-7grade),
>D(8-10)and A(11-12) level students you will need to have three sets of
>curriculum.
>
>Suggestion 2.  Go through the TABE test and pick out keywords and words that
>are at a level that indicates to you that your students need to see their
>definitions. Teach those words to your students. It will amaze you how
>easily you can spot these words after working with your students for a bit
>of time.
>
>	Reading's largest factor, after being able to call words, is made up
>of our
>ability to give our minds the proper definition of words that are being used
>in the text. This is meekly known as vocabulary, these days. TABE can only
>choose a small fraction of vocabulary and keywords in its' tests. That, I
>believe, is  why reading assessment tests are so inept at showing progress.
>The odds are infinitely small, given the number of words in our language,
>that your students will have looked up the words contained in the test.
>
>	We are still in such a state of development on this subject that I
>do not
>even think anyone has made an official ruling as to if teaching the specific
>vocabulary of the TABE is allowed.
>
>	Anyone out there know about this issue?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nifl-fobasics@nifl.gov [mailto:nifl-fobasics@nifl.gov]On Behalf Of
>Richard T. Boone
>Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 9:36 AM
>To: Multiple recipients of list
>Subject: [NIFL-FOBASICS:869] Managing Statistics
>
>
>
>
>I run a small computerized Workplace Literacy lab and have several
>questions.
>I hope I may receive some feedback on the following topics.
>
>1)	Students are referred to me for a 30-60 day time period to "bring
>their
>scores up", so they may enter some form of training. What would be
>considered a normative increase in TABE scores for students averaging 20
>hours a week in the lab?
>I do realize that "I am teaching to the TABE", but I see no alternative
>given the short time periods.
>     2)   Every 50 hours I am supposed to retest students giving the
>complete TABE battery. Several students will drop out right after retesting;
>they know they have done poorly even before the tests are scored. How do you
>deal with this problem?
>
>2)	I am highly dependant on state, labor and county officials for
>referrals.
>It appears that their job criteria demand that data management is the
>overriding concern. The "goals" of students must be met at close to a 100%
>success rate, so data must be managed to accomplish this success rate. How
>do others deal with this?
>
>
>
>
>________________________________________________________________
>Sent via the Vineland WebMail system at vineland.org
>
>
>
>
>

Jennifer Roloff Welch
Doctoral Student in Learning and Teaching
Harvard Graduate School of Education



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:17:00 EST