Return-Path: <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id i1AFYTI18854; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:34:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:34:29 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <5E3C683D.516299E3.0A349A3F@aol.com> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: AWilder106@aol.com To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-FOBASICS:963] Re: The Gold Standard (Tom Woods, brief) X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0 Status: O Content-Length: 525 Lines: 5 And thank you, too, Ellie. For those interested in the structure of social science research, the framework I laid out is a general one, it applies to quantitative studies, also. I used Shirley Brice Heath as an example because there is a misconception that the quantitative framework is not the same as the qualitative one; this is incorrect. The data collection methods and analyses are different. The same framework can also cover the use of quantitative and qualitative methodologies within the same study. Andrea
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 23 2004 - 09:47:13 EST