[NIFL-FOBASICS:1019] Re: knowledge

From: AndresMuro@aol.com
Date: Wed Mar 31 2004 - 17:15:58 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id i2VMFwm13911; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:15:58 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:15:58 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <630CD822.5FC5FC64.0AB94E44@aol.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: AndresMuro@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-FOBASICS:1019] Re: knowledge
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0
Status: O
Content-Length: 195
Lines: 8


btw, intuition is a very valid form of knowledge. when i referred to knowledge i was referring to rational and intuitive knowledge. 

andres

-- 
go here: www.geocities.com/andresmuro/art.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 23 2004 - 09:47:15 EST