[NIFL-FOBASICS:1093] TABE 9 & 10 Recommendations

From: Cindi Riley (criley@lowcountryliteracy.org)
Date: Tue Aug 03 2004 - 14:36:52 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id i73Iaq118699; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 14:36:52 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 14:36:52 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <NFBBLOIHMLMKMMIMMBECMELCGBAA.criley@lowcountryliteracy.org>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Cindi Riley" <criley@lowcountryliteracy.org>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-FOBASICS:1093] TABE 9 & 10 Recommendations
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
Status: O
Content-Length: 5936
Lines: 155

I know that there is a NIFL list just for assessment, but short of joining
yet another NIFL list, I thought I would post my question here first. We
need to invest in some new TABE materials. What do you folks suggest? Should
we go with the newest-9 & 10? Or should we order more 7 & 8? I am not
familiar with the TABE much at all. Has 9 & 10 been aligned with NRS
standards? Do the scaled scores from 9 & 10 correspond to forms 7 & 8 so you
get NRS-reportable results? What would you recommend that an adult literacy
community-based organization get? Do we have to get the complete battery or
will the survey do? As you can see, I need lots of help! Thanks in advance.

********************
Cindi Riley
Assistant Director
Literacy Volunteers of the Lowcountry
1403 Prince St.
Beaufort, SC 29902
phone 843-525-6658
fax 843-521-1945
criley@lowcountryliteracy.org
www.lowcountryliteracy.org

-----Original Message-----
From: nifl-fobasics@nifl.gov [mailto:nifl-fobasics@nifl.gov]On Behalf Of Sue
Pierson
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 10:11 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: [NIFL-FOBASICS:1091] FW: RE: Help With Curriculum. Dr. Rosen,


Susan Pierson
ATDN Trainer
CREC
111 Charter Oak Avenue
Hartford, CT 06106
spierson@crec.org
Phone: 860-524-4024
Fax: : 860-524-4050


-----Original Message-----
From: Sue Pierson
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 9:56 AM
To: 'nifl-fobasics@nifl.gov'
Subject: RE: [NIFL-FOBASICS:1090] RE: Help With Curriculum. Dr. Rosen,

As an External Diploma Program trainer for Connecticut, I would like to
respond to the comments about EDP.  The External Diploma Program should
be considered as an alternative to the GED or Credit Diploma. Since the
EDP is an appropriate program for the mature adult who is
self-motivated, self-directed and the program is non-instructional, it
should not be confused with being for someone who is not ready for GED.
Please understand that it is not easier: it is different.  A person
taking the GED could pass by getting about half the answers correct and
not have to get any Algebra answers right.  In EDP, all 65 competencies
must be demonstrated 100%.
EDP works well for the person who cannot or does not want to attend
classes.
It works well for someone who has test anxiety or needs more time to
take a test.  We have found that more and more ESL students are
successful in getting their high school diploma through EDP because of
the time factor involved in taking the GED test.
For more information, please check our web site:

 http://www.crec.org/atdn/HSC/edpintro.shtml

Note that I received this message from your listserv through a
colleague, I am not aware of your previous conversations on this
subject.
Please feel free to contact me if you wish to discuss it further.
Thanks, Sue Pierson


Susan Pierson
ATDN Trainer
CREC
111 Charter Oak Avenue
Hartford, CT 06106
spierson@crec.org
Phone: 860-524-4024
Fax: : 860-524-4050


-----Original Message-----
From: nifl-fobasics@nifl.gov [mailto:nifl-fobasics@nifl.gov] On Behalf
Of Isserlis, Janet
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 9:25 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: [NIFL-FOBASICS:1090] RE: Help With Curriculum. Dr. Rosen,

in addition to the excellent references from David and others (re: EFF,
etc), I'm wondering if anyone sees the External Diploma Program as a
viable alternative for folks who are not yet ready for the GED, and/or
for whom the GED might not even be a useful credential?

Janet Isserliss

> ----------
> From:         nifl-fobasics@nifl.gov on behalf of Sandra D Scanlon
> Reply To:     nifl-fobasics@nifl.gov
> Sent:         Saturday, July 31, 2004 9:51 AM
> To:   Multiple recipients of list
> Subject:      [NIFL-FOBASICS:1085] RE: Help With Curriculum. Dr.
Rosen,
>
> I read, with great interest, the discussions by members of this list
serve
> and would like to present a dilemma relative to ABE and GED
instructional
> programs for discussion.  Most of our agency's learners are myopically
> focused, "I need to pass the GED test, and the sooner the better -
like
> yesterday."  Some learners only require a refresher in language arts
writing
> and upper-level numeracy skills.  These learners have scored at least
an 8th
> grade reading level and want to move forward, quickly.  The dilemma
occurs
> for those learners below a 7th grade reading skills ability, and they
too
> want to quickly move forward.  They need to feel that their immediate
goal
> is being met, and if not, this is a sure way to lose them.  During
> orientation, learners are assessed for reading and numeracy skills,
the
> learners do an analysis of their test results, start their individual
> learning plan, and set short and long-term goals i.e. reading to
> children/grandchildren, entering college, getting a job, or a better
job.
> Passing the GED is viewed as a step toward their goal. Any thoughts
about
> solutions to this dilemma?
>
> Sandy Scanlon
>
>

The documents accompanying this fax or e-mail transmission including any
attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient's) and MAY
contain confidential health or other confidential information that is
legally privileged information.  The authorized recipient of this
information is prohibited from disclosing this information to any other
party unless required to do so by law or regulation and is required to
destroy the information after its stated need has been fulfilled.

If you are NOT the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that ANY
disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken in reliance on the
contents of these documents is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this information via facsimile, in error, please notify the sender
immediately and arrange for return or destruction of these documents. If
information is received via e-mail and you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the sender by e-mail immediately and delete/destroy both the
original and the reply e-mail message.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 23 2004 - 09:47:17 EST