[NIFL-FOBASICS:1171] Re: Long division --HELP!!!!

From: Michele Craig (shellcraig@ix.netcom.com) ((shellcraig@ix.netcom.com))
Date: Thu Nov 18 2004 - 19:00:46 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id iAJ00k117706; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:00:46 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:00:46 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20041118153904.00a4b710@pop.ix.netcom.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Michele Craig (shellcraig@ix.netcom.com)" <shellcraig@ix.netcom.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-FOBASICS:1171] Re: Long division --HELP!!!!
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
Status: O
Content-Length: 1649
Lines: 33


>Lynne wrote,
>
>Long division is a perfect example of this.  How many people really
>understand why long division works -- we all just know how to do it.  Some
>of us did have the "aha!" when we got good at it, but most just know what to
>do and know that the right answer magically appears at the end of the
>procedure.  But for students with logical-sequential processing
>difficulties, just learning the steps without a sense of where they're
>leading is very hard.  So it helps to stop pretending that the steps make
>sense -- and really, most people are indeed pretending -- just learn the
>routine.  At the same time, these students have a very great need to keep
>track of where they're going, so you do want to keep linking back to the
>reason you're engaging in all these contortions in the first place, and also
>to track progress through the procedure.


This is what I was realizing when I was trying to show the procedure to 
these students. When we write the problem 200 divided by 5 in long division 
form, why isn't the first factor (0ver the top line) 40 instead of 4 (and 
then in the next step an 0)? This is really counterintuitive and doesn't 
show the place value. It looks like you are subtracting a 20 rather than a 
200. What I realized is that I too am a tactile learner when it comes to 
math and that I don't really understand how division works in the abstract. 
I can divide real things into equal parts and I can use long division to 
divide things, but I can't really explain how the long division really 
represents concrete operations, because it doesn't seem to have an easy 
concrete demonstration.

Michele



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 23 2004 - 09:47:19 EST