[NIFL-FOBASICS:1208] RE: Plateaus for beginning ABE readers--2nd & 3rd grade level. Why?

From: AWilder106@aol.com
Date: Thu Dec 02 2004 - 13:55:19 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id iB2ItJF28128; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:55:19 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:55:19 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <3BBF4992.28EAE914.0A349A3F@aol.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: AWilder106@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-FOBASICS:1208] RE: Plateaus for beginning ABE readers--2nd & 3rd grade level. Why?
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0
Status: O
Content-Length: 584
Lines: 13

I hope I'm not getting in too deep here.

There are actually two ideas here that I can think of.

1)  Sight word learners can probably make do until 2nd-3rd grade.  Don't need phonology.  Then they need the support of phonics.

2)  Chall's analysis really I think revolved round vocabulary--kids didn't have the (inherent) vocabulary to move ahead swiftly.  She put the problem area one year ahead--4th grade. 

The idea is that adults  have more vocabulary than kids, BUT     a phonological deficit or simply lack of knowledge could stop them cold.

Any teachers out there?

Andrea 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 23 2004 - 09:47:20 EST