[NIFL-FOBASICS:1215] Re: Plateaus for beginning ABE readers--2nd & 3rd grade level. Why?

From: Woods (woods@ncia.net)
Date: Fri Dec 03 2004 - 00:53:02 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id iB35r2F05767; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 00:53:02 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 00:53:02 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <002001c4d8fb$d7b5bfe0$890a1845@DeepThought>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Woods" <woods@ncia.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-FOBASICS:1215] Re: Plateaus for beginning ABE readers--2nd & 3rd grade level. Why?
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
Status: O
Content-Length: 967
Lines: 22

Jean Marrapodi wrote:
> "People who can't read well consistently test at the second or third grade
> level regardless of age or schooling."
>
> Do you see validity in that?

In my teacher training I learned that by third grade, normal readers will 
acquire all of the reading skills and strategies needed to read. Everything 
after that is further refinement and honing. So it would make sense to say 
that a reader who has not yet acquired the necessary foundational skills is 
probably not reading at an instructional level in third grade reading 
material.

I would say from my own work with adults that those who can read fourth or 
fifth grade material at an instructional level can read fairly well, but 
those who struggle to read second and third grade material are the ones I 
need to focus my efforts on. Fourth and fifth grade level material is really 
pretty mature. Consider that most newspapers are written at about the fifth 
grade level.

Tom Woods 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 23 2004 - 09:47:20 EST