[NIFL-FOBASICS:1466] Re: Explicit Literacy Impact Study - ESL Question

From: John Nissen (jn@cloudworld.co.uk)
Date: Mon Aug 29 2005 - 09:25:45 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j7TDPeG17792; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 09:25:45 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 09:25:45 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <011101c5ac9c$6f4fbee0$0302a8c0@Tomschoice>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "John Nissen" <jn@cloudworld.co.uk>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-FOBASICS:1466] Re: Explicit Literacy Impact Study - ESL Question
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
Status: O
Content-Length: 2339
Lines: 69


Hello Cyndy,

I had a look at the summary paper at the URL you gave.  I was intrigued by 
the Explicit Literacy, and asked my wife what it might be about.  She 
suggested porn!

Joking apart, I wondered if they were going to teach "explicit phonics", 
which is closely related to what we call "synthetic phonics" on this side of 
the pond.  (The 'synthesis' is the blending of sounds to make words.)  After 
the success of the Clackmannanshire study on synthetic phonics, the 
government is having a review of their literacy strategy.  And the 
opposition (Tories) are saying we should go to synthetic phonics straight 
away.

Unfortunately, looking at the summary paper, it is clear that they are not 
going focus on phonics, let alone explicit phonics or synthetic phonics. 
They are going to focus on everything - which means focussing on nothing - 
just as we have been doing in the National Literacy Strategy, which is a mix 
of methods, guaranteed to confuse the kids.

But it is not late.  Your Explicit Literacy Impact Study could still embrace 
explicit and synthetic phonics.  Then we should see some dramatic results, 
or I'll eat my hat (an early word to teach in synthetic phonics).

Best wishes,

John

John Nissen
Cloudworld Ltd - http://www.cloudworld.co.uk
maker of the assistive reader, WordAloud.
Tel: +44 208 742 3170  Fax: +44 208 742 0202
Email: info@cloudworld.co.uk



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Colletti, Cyndy" <CColletti@ILSOS.NET>
To: "Multiple recipients of list" <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov>
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 2:36 PM
Subject: [NIFL-FOBASICS:1464] Explicit Literacy Impact Study - ESL Question


> The Explicit Literacy Impact Study is a national research project.  More 
> information available at this URL
> http://www.air.org/ExplicitLiteracy/docs/ExLiteracyStudySummary.pdf
>
> Cyndy Colletti
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nifl-fobasics@nifl.gov [mailto:nifl-fobasics@nifl.gov]On Behalf Of
> Katrina Hinson
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 7:01 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: [NIFL-FOBASICS:1463] ESL Question
>
>
> Have any of you  heard of the Explicit Literacy Impact Study for the adult 
> ESL population? If so, can you point me in the direction of any resources 
> or information related to it?
>
> Thanks a bunch.
>
> Katrina Hinson
>
>
> 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:49:33 EST