[NIFL-FOBASICS:1471] RE: Expertise in Low Literacy Learners Question

From: Susan Manger (smanger@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Sep 01 2005 - 15:15:40 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j81JFeG29919; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:15:40 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:15:40 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <BAY104-F85FE082104D07A4CD121EAEA00@phx.gbl>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Susan Manger" <smanger@hotmail.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-FOBASICS:1471] RE: Expertise in Low Literacy Learners Question
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Type: text/html; format=flowed
Status: O
Content-Length: 3020
Lines: 8

Certainly our population has expertise in many areas - auto mechanic, cook, crop harvesting, surviving in this world. I thingk that calling their attention to this expertise is a positive thing and I do it all of the time!




Susan Manger
Brawley Public Library
LVA/Imperial Valley
California

From: PHCSJean.2164047@bloglines.com
Reply-To: nifl-fobasics@nifl.gov
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-FOBASICS:1469] Expertise in Low Literacy Learners Question
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 13:43:52 -0400 (EDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from literacy.nifl.gov ([192.188.111.2]) by MC8-F24.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 1 Sep 2005 10:43:57 -0700
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1])by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j81HhqG27188;Thu, 1 Sep 2005 13:43:52 -0400 (EDT)
Good day everyone!
The endless dissertation process continues. I've encountered
a new hurdle in the committee review process, and I'm hoping you all might
have some feedback for me.

I'm doing my work on the metacognitive processes
of low literacy learners during the reading process and comparing it with
their metacognitive processes during something they would perceive themselves
to be experts at. I'm considering metacognition to be thinking about thinking,
sort of self reflecting on the how-do-I-do-this. Ultimately, I think there
may be some transfer of learning opportunities between the way the expert
area is thought about and the reading development, but that's way off. At
this point, I'm getting ready to do the interviews.

The psychology professor
on my committee has a HUGE issue with using the term "expert" with the population.
(I will be working with public ABE programs and an incarcerated population
who are all native English speakers.) She thinks that the term could be offensive
and intimidating. I believe that everyone is gifted in some area and has strength
in something. In the ABE population, it just isn't reading, and all too often
they get stuck in that 2nd-3rd grade level and never make the transition to
fluent reading and comprehension. I'm looking to see if there is something
to help unlock that--whatever it might be.

Here's the question. In your
experience, which I suspect is similar to mine, have you seen areas of expertise
in your students? Do you think the term "expert" would be problematic?

Any other insights would be much appreciated.

Jean Marrapodi
Providence
Assembly of God Learning Center
Providence, RI



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:49:34 EST