Return-Path: <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j82EYqG25468; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 10:34:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 10:34:52 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20050902143248.28942.qmail@web30811.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: Ujwala Samant <lalumineuse@yahoo.com> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-fobasics@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-FOBASICS:1477] RE: Expertise in Low Literacy X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Status: O Content-Length: 558 Lines: 23 Good point Andres...I prefer calling it knowlegde.. but would learners see it as knowledge? I've found that learners often devalue what they know because it does not 'fit' the 'norm' of what is 'sold' as 'knowledge'. So, how do we value or 'teach' learners to see what they have as knowledge? Ujwala --- Andres Muro <andresm@epcc.edu> wrote: > Can you just call it knowledge? > > Andres > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:49:34 EST