Return-Path: <nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.9.3/8.9.0.Beta5/980425bjb) with SMTP id MAA15818; Wed, 1 Mar 2000 12:26:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 12:26:23 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <38BD5095.70D696B4@agctr.lsu.edu> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: Annrose Guarino <aguarino@agctr.lsu.edu> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-HEALTH:2261] Validity and Reliability for Instruments X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; U) Status: OR Is anyone aware of research that determined reliability for an evaluation instrument that measures health education outcomes using both pictorials and written subject matter content statements? I am interested in learning more about evaluation instruments that use pictorials with non-readers. Thank you for your comments. -- Annrose Guarino, MS, RD, LDN Coord, Family Nutrition Program 287 Knapp, (225)388-6701, FAX (225)334-2132 LSU Ag Center P.O. Box 25100 Baton Rouge, LA 70894-5100
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:42:59 EST