Return-Path: <nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.9.3/8.9.0.Beta5/980425bjb) with SMTP id NAA16688; Wed, 1 Mar 2000 13:11:16 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 13:11:16 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <01BF8369.B46E5E80.sandras@u.washington.edu> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: Sandra Smith <sandras@u.washington.edu> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-HEALTH:2262] RE: Validity and Reliability for Instruments X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 Status: OR Annrose, great question! Please share responses. SS -----Original Message----- From: Annrose Guarino [SMTP:aguarino@agctr.lsu.edu] Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2000 9:26 AM To: Multiple recipients of list Subject: [NIFL-HEALTH:2261] Validity and Reliability for Instruments Is anyone aware of research that determined reliability for an evaluation instrument that measures health education outcomes using both pictorials and written subject matter content statements? I am interested in learning more about evaluation instruments that use pictorials with non-readers. Thank you for your comments. -- Annrose Guarino, MS, RD, LDN Coord, Family Nutrition Program 287 Knapp, (225)388-6701, FAX (225)334-2132 LSU Ag Center P.O. Box 25100 Baton Rouge, LA 70894-5100
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:42:59 EST