Return-Path: <nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id e9QJLn920184; Thu, 26 Oct 2000 15:21:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 15:21:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <Pine.A41.4.21.0010261209420.324218-100000@aagaard03.u.washington.edu> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: Kristina Anderson <keander@u.washington.edu> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-HEALTH:2675] Re: Easy-to-read sites X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Status: OR I used SMOG and Flesch Reading Ease. I usually test materials using both. There are some sites included, like MD Consult, that have materials at a higher reading level, but they are really good sites for "easier" to read materials. MD Consult is more like 7th grade, if memory serves me. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kristina Anderson Literacy Coordinator Harborview Medical Center 325 9th Avenue, Box 359710 Seattle, WA 98104 Phone (206) 731-6621 Pager (206) 994-7227 Fax (206) 731-2023 On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Nancy Gonzalez-Caro wrote: > Which readability scales/tests did you use? > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:43:08 EST