Return-Path: <root> Received: (from root@localhost) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) id f7VBqUg09190 for health-archive@nifl.gov; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 07:52:30 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Message-Id: <200108311152.f7VBqUg09190@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from imo-d10.mx.aol.com (imo-d10.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.42]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f1RLRc906114 for <nifl-health@nifl.gov>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 16:27:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from Lendoak@aol.com by imo-d10.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v29.5.) id p.82.771af99 (3851) for <nifl-health@nifl.gov>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 16:25:48 -0500 (EST) From: Lendoak@aol.com Message-ID: <82.771af99.27cd755b@aol.com> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 16:25:47 EST Subject: Re: [NIFL-HEALTH:2872] SMOG Readability assessment To: nifl-health@nifl.gov Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 38 Resent-From: root@literacy.nifl.gov Resent-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 07:52:30 -0400 Resent-To: health-archive@nifl.gov Status: O Content-Length: 212 Lines: 9 Dear Kathy, We've read that SMOG was developed later than the Gunning FOG Index. To differentiate the now formula from FOG, a new name SMOG was chosen. This is not an acronym. Best wishes, Len and Ceci Doak
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 11:28:27 EST