Re: [NIFL-HEALTH:2991] Literacy and health collaborations

From: Dwyoho@aol.com
Date: Tue Apr 10 2001 - 13:43:06 EDT


Return-Path: <root>
Received: (from root@localhost) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) id f7VBrio09817 for health-archive@nifl.gov; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 07:53:44 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-Message-Id: <200108311153.f7VBrio09817@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from imo-m08.mx.aol.com (imo-m08.mx.aol.com [64.12.136.163]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f3AHhFg03887 for <nifl-health@nifl.gov>; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 13:43:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from Dwyoho@aol.com by imo-m08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v29.14.) id p.d3.132946ff (4263) for <nifl-health@nifl.gov>; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 13:43:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: Dwyoho@aol.com
Message-ID: <d3.132946ff.2804a02a@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 13:43:06 EDT
Subject: Re: [NIFL-HEALTH:2991] Literacy and health collaborations
To: nifl-health@nifl.gov
Content-Type:  multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_d3.132946ff.2804a02a_boundary"
Content-Disposition:  Inline
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10520
Resent-From: root@literacy.nifl.gov
Resent-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 07:53:44 -0400
Resent-To: health-archive@nifl.gov
Status: O
Content-Length: 8333
Lines: 150

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 04/07/2001 2:24:38 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
Plnenglish@aol.com writes:


> I don't think we 
> can convince health care providers that their impressions are wrong with 
> the 
> data I'm thinking of. 
> 
> 
I'd like to pose a new question:  Literacy professionals, what have health 
folk taught you, and health people, what have you learner from literacy 
professionals beyond the shock of the depth of the literacy  problem?

This excellent dialog (let's keep it going) provides a case example of a 
point I raised earlier:  One dynamic to consider when crafting effective 
collaborations is the tendency of health professionals to look for data and 
research to make decisions about programming, while literacy professionals 
tend to focus on the individual involved, and ways to help adults reach 
goals, many of which are not measurable by the standards the health community 
is used to.  The literacy profession has and continues to struggle mightily 
with tracking outcomes and providing data that demonstrates the efficacy of 
adult literacy programs.  Health people are way ahead of literacy folk in 
setting standards, establishing benchmarks, proving "cause and effect".  It 
is one of the reasons why this dialog is so critical.  We have so much to 
teach each other.

When I talk to health professinals about the difficult area of motivating 
people to change health behavior, I find I am usually on more common ground.  
The inherent problems health professionals face who deal with health 
prevention are often very similiar to what literacy professionals deal with:  
compliance, factors like lifestyle, family history,all the issues of poverty, 
etc.  One contributor here has already commented about the craziness of how 
literacy now "counts" its success, such as retention and enrollment rates.  
Suppose health professionals were called to task because (statistics guessed 
at) over 50% of all adults are overweight and not even 1% are successful in 
addressing this health issue?  The health prevention people know the 
difficulty in proving the long-term effectiveness of health education 
efforts.  We all understand we are working WITH people, not ON them, that 
this is America where adults are free to choose, and we are not manufacturing 
widgets.  

I like to share that one of the most important insights I have gleaned from 
dialog with health professionals is what I call the "high stakes" of the 
health care environment for many professionals.  If I go to work and have an 
off-day where not much is accomlplished, after all, nobody gets any "sicker" 
in terms of their literacy needs.  Literacy work, however valuable, is not 
crisis intervention.  Often, health care providers are dealing with exactly 
that--a looming crisis where the result of intervention is absolutely 
critical, and often immediately apparent.  When I began to really think of 
what this means for health literacy, I saw the problem with new eyes.  Thank 
you, List Contributors, especially nurses, for teaching me that.  

How about some reflection and further discussion:   Literacy professionals, 
what have you learned from health people, and health folks, what has literacy 
taught you?  (You'll note my implicit avoidance of any argument over whether 
or not we have anything to teach each other--to me it is a foregone 
conclusion).   Regards, Debbie
 



Deborah W. Yoho
Co-moderator, NIFL Health Literacy Discussion Group
Chief Executive Officer
Greater Columbia Literacy Council
921 Woodrow Street  
Columbia, SC  29205
803/765-2555   dwyoho@aol.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 11:28:30 EST