[NIFL-HEALTH:3426] Re: Providers assessing literacy level-- W

From: lpbml (lpbml@pacbell.net)
Date: Fri Oct 26 2001 - 00:40:01 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f9Q4e1006187; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 00:40:01 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 00:40:01 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <MABBKFDHLFFKFFADLABNCENJCDAA.lpbml@pacbell.net>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: lpbml <lpbml@pacbell.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-HEALTH:3426] Re: Providers assessing literacy level-- W
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Status: O
Content-Length: 4652
Lines: 91

Jan:

Sorry to learn of your husband's diagnosis. I've been in your shoes. When my
14-month-old little boy was diagnosed with Nephrotic Syndrome, I had never
heard of the disease. Mainly, because it effects predominantly little boys
and the odds of acquiring the disease are beyond belief; 2 boys per year,
per 7,000,000, in a population of 100,000. I had better odds of winning the
California lottery. The odds of survival were 90%. He was one of the 10%.

My husband's first wife had succumbed to cancer before liver transplants
were available, which would have saved her life. Breast cancer had
metastasized in her liver. He was already a well informed, educated medical
consumer because of the long battle they had fought and lost. From the time
Lee, our son, was diagnosed we both read, researched, questioned, queried
pharmacists, doctors, hospitals etc. We pulled medical research findings,
established as well as experimental, contra indications of treatment and
medications beyond PDR explanations. Every visit to our doctor was well
researched, so we knew what questions to ask, why to ask them etc. We did
not expect nor did we receive dummied or watered down information. We
learned the kidney's structure inside and out including the layers of the
kidney tissues, how they worked to cleanse themselves, what did not happen
correctly when remission was not present. Along with this came educating
ourselves to the point that we knew when the orders were wrong on the chart.
This happened on more than one occasion, because a young ethnically
connected male doctor decided he knew a better protocol than the one
established by the treating doctor. Had we not been there our son would have
died of a stroke because the lasix chaser was being run too quickly (at too
high a rate) after the main infusion which increases the blood pressure to a
point where the veins burst. We told the hospital to dc all meds and stop
the treatment, which included removing the doctor from our son's service.
This happened in less than 3 minutes. They knew we meant business.

My point is that dummied down literature and medical information gives the
patient or patient's advocate little or no backbone to rely on when changes
need to be made immediately. You must know your rights, hospital protocol
and exactly how to accomplish them to obtain the needed or desired result,
in addition to the ailment or illness being treated. Most doctors and
hospitals dismiss consumers complaints and questions if they cannot
articulate their concerns or desires at a level that indicates their ability
to understand a medical practice or protocol. We are only shooting ourselves
in the foot to advocate for simplistic, uninformed, dummied down medical
information and literature.

-----Original Message-----
From: nifl-health@nifl.gov [mailto:nifl-health@nifl.gov]On Behalf Of
Platte, Jan
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:04 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: [NIFL-HEALTH:3419] Re: Providers assessing literacy level-- W


Everyone,

My husband and I have just traversed a very rocky road with his diagnosis in
January of a rare cancer.  We are both well educated and I being the
coordinator of an adult literacy program am well aware of the problems
surrounding this issue of literacy levels in health care.

Even well educated folks benefit from explanations in basic language.  Once
you hear that diagnosis your brain shuts down and you don't process
everything you are told.  Probably the main reason health care providers
tell you to bring someone with you.  We appreciated explanations in plain
language and guidance on where we might obtain additional information.  (I
became really good at research on the web.)

I don't think giving every person who walks in the door a quick assessment
of their literacy skills is a viable solution.  Educating providers to be
aware that literacy level is an issue and that people often hide the fact
that they don't understand the material is a big step.

We found most health care professionals we dealt with quickly picked up on
our level of understanding as we grew with the process and adjusted
accordingly. One RN told the attending physician, "These folks want to know
everything."  He however didn't think we needed to know everything - that's
a whole other discussion.

Bottom line, educating health care professionals and well written materials
would go a long way in addressing the needs of the patient.

My 2 cents worth.

Jan Platte
Adult Literacy Program Coordinator
Westminster Public Library
3705 W. 112th Ave.
Westminster, CO 80031-2140
(303) 430 - 2400 ext. 2316
jplatte@ci.westminster.co.us



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 11:28:43 EST