[NIFL-HEALTH:3430] Re: Providers assessing literacy level-- W

From: Mark V. Williams, MD (mwillia@emory.edu)
Date: Fri Oct 26 2001 - 13:55:42 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f9QHtg001713; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 13:55:42 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 13:55:42 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <NEBBJLPFCLHEKAHAAJCJKEAAFBAA.mwillia@emory.edu>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Mark V. Williams, MD" <mwillia@emory.edu>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-HEALTH:3430] Re: Providers assessing literacy level-- W
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
Status: O
Content-Length: 8161
Lines: 174

Thank you for this erudite story describing the complexity of medical
decision-making.
Take care,
Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: nifl-health@nifl.gov [mailto:nifl-health@nifl.gov]On Behalf Of
Jeri Levesque
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:11 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: [NIFL-HEALTH:3428] Re: Providers assessing literacy level-- W



--------------F239B089FAA216C65000F1CC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854";
x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Jan and Others:

Assessing patient's literacy needs has always been an interesting
discussion. I
discovered an interesting situation regarding Breast Cancer. As this is
National Breast Cancer month, please allow me to broach the subject of
patient
decision making.

After my fourth biopsy in 7 years I was confronted with choosing between
treatment options which included a prophylactic bilateral mastectomy. The
current practice for surgeons is to give patients information but not to
direct
the patient toward a treatment option. My surgeon told me that as an
intelligent, well educated woman, it was my responsibility to research the
disease and treatment options and then to return to him with questions and a
decision regarding treatment.

I am a reading specialist who defines comprehension as the process of
creating
meaning from print by bridging prior knowledge of a subject with new
information. As a tenured university professor I have well honed research
skills. However, reviewing articles from Medline and the gamut of cancer
related web sites I finally surrendered to information overload. For every
point regarding prophylactic bilateral mastectomies with TRAM flap
reconstruction there is a counterpoint. I do not have adequate background
knowledge to discern an author's bias or previous work in the field.

I sought a second opinion and the practice of "patient makes the decision
without particular surgeon guidance" held. Imagine trying to decide how to
invest all of your retirement in the current stock market with a financial
advisor who tells you to figure it out for yourself. My conclusion to have
surgery was supported and I am now in my sixth week of recovery.

A couple of health literacy lessons. First, the Internet  based health
issues
Chat rooms provide a good forum for emotional support. The search engine
allows
one to zero in on specific questions and issues regarding cancer types,
treatments, and recoveries. They are succinct discussions with relatively
low
levels of readability. Second; Y Me, Susan Komen, Sloan Kettering, Johns
Hopkings, Cancernet and others have straightforward FAQ's that are handled
by
physicians. These are clearly cataloged and linked to other concerns. Most
key
vocabulary is hot linked to definitions and further explanations. The
readability is higher but the FAQ's allow a standard paragraph per question.
Third; patients can access medical journal abstracts and collect current
information regarding treatment options including new  studies such as the
STAR
Trials. This information is not intended for consumers but very informative
to
well educated readers.

Bottom line; after weeks of research on the Internet I was most comfortable
with one on one conversations with my two surgeons. I seriously question
however how Jane Doe, a woman with an eighth grade reading ability could
make a
rational decision through print materials alone. I did find a health
literacy
project that bridged the gap. The day before my surgery I watched a video,
Just
Between Friends produced by Washington University funded by Susan Komen
Foundation. This was a health literacy project that includes a small booklet
on
breast cancer and a FAQ video about options and recovery. I have to admit
between the video and the booklet all the basis were covered to inform a
woman
to the point of asking her doctor good questions and choosing a treatment
option. As we all know, patients need high touch human communication just as
much as high tech health information sources.

A toast to all of the pink ribbons,

Jeri Levesque, Ed.D.
Associate Professor, Webster University
Director; Webster University Literacy Center
St. Louis, MO

--------------F239B089FAA216C65000F1CC
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Jan and Others:
<p>Assessing patient's literacy needs has always been an interesting
discussion.
I discovered an interesting situation regarding Breast Cancer. As this
is National Breast Cancer month, please allow me to broach the subject
of patient decision making.
<p>After my fourth biopsy in 7 years I was confronted with choosing between
treatment options which included a prophylactic bilateral mastectomy. The
current practice for surgeons is to give patients information but not to
direct the patient toward a treatment option. My surgeon told me that as
an intelligent, well educated woman, it was my responsibility to research
the disease and treatment options and then to return to him with questions
and a decision regarding treatment.
<p>I am a reading specialist who defines comprehension as the process of
creating meaning from print by bridging prior knowledge of a subject with
new information. As a tenured university professor I have well honed
research
skills. However, reviewing articles from Medline and the gamut of cancer
related web sites I finally surrendered to information overload. For every
point regarding prophylactic bilateral mastectomies with TRAM flap
reconstruction
there is a counterpoint. I do not have adequate background knowledge to
discern an author's bias or previous work in the field.
<p>I sought a second opinion and the practice of "patient makes the decision
without particular surgeon guidance" held. Imagine trying to decide how
to invest all of your retirement in the current stock market with a
financial
advisor who tells you to figure it out for yourself. My conclusion to have
surgery was supported and I am now in my sixth week of recovery.
<p>A couple of health literacy lessons. First, the Internet&nbsp; based
health issues Chat rooms provide a good forum for emotional support. The
search engine allows one to zero in on specific questions and issues
regarding
cancer types, treatments, and recoveries. They are succinct discussions
with relatively low levels of readability. Second; Y Me, Susan Komen, Sloan
Kettering, Johns Hopkings, Cancernet and others have straightforward FAQ's
that are handled by physicians. These are clearly cataloged and linked
to other concerns. Most key vocabulary is hot linked to definitions and
further explanations. The readability is higher but the FAQ's allow a
standard
paragraph per question. Third; patients can access medical journal abstracts
and collect current information regarding treatment options including
new&nbsp;
studies such as the STAR Trials. This information is not intended for
consumers
but very informative to well educated readers.
<p>Bottom line; after weeks of research on the Internet I was most
comfortable
with one on one conversations with my two surgeons. I seriously question
however how Jane Doe, a woman with an eighth grade reading ability could
make a rational decision through print materials alone. I did find a health
literacy project that bridged the gap. The day before my surgery I watched
a video, <u>Just Between Friends</u> produced by Washington University
funded by Susan Komen Foundation. This was a health literacy project that
includes a small booklet on breast cancer and a FAQ video about options
and recovery. I have to admit between the video and the booklet all the
basis were covered to inform a woman to the point of asking her doctor
good questions and choosing a treatment option. As we all know, patients
need high touch human communication just as much as high tech health
information
sources.
<p>A toast to all of the pink ribbons,
<p>Jeri Levesque, Ed.D.
<br>Associate Professor, Webster University
<br>Director; Webster University Literacy Center
<br>St. Louis, MO</html>

--------------F239B089FAA216C65000F1CC--



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 11:28:43 EST