Return-Path: <nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id fA9JwD005584; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 14:58:13 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 14:58:13 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111091155400.22235@hymn07.u.washington.edu> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: <rrmiller@u.washington.edu> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-HEALTH:3447] approaching adults regarding literacy levels X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Status: O Content-Length: 546 Lines: 7 Hello, I know that there have been discussions in the past, addressing best approaches to identifying literacy levels in adults. I have been asked to comment on a teaching tool which identifies "literacy level" under the "Barriers" section. I would like to offer the education committee some constructive feedback as to respectful, competent ways to approach patients when needing to ascertain their current reading/writing/comprehension abilities and when asking how well our educational materials meet their needs. Thank you. Rosalie Miller
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 11:28:44 EST