Return-Path: <nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id fAFNXn014204; Thu, 15 Nov 2001 18:33:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 18:33:50 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <4BDB4406836DD411858900508BCF5EB7FD78B3@medmail7.medctr.ucla.edu> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: "Weintraub, Debra" <DWeintraub@mednet.ucla.edu> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-HEALTH:3452] In Search of Validation of Readability and Health Literacy Tools X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Type: text/plain; X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Status: O Content-Length: 381 Lines: 7 I am looking for any validation/evaluation that has been done on readability, health literacy, and cultural sensitivity assessment tools. Specifically, I am interested in learning about the validation of the SAM (Suitability Assessment of Materials), SMOG, Flesch-Kincaid test, and FOG tests. Can anyone direct me where to find this information? Much appreciated, Debbie Weintraub
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 11:28:44 EST