Return-Path: <nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id fAJFem000163; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 10:40:49 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 10:40:49 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20011119103109.01c3d740@postoffice.brown.edu> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: Christina Zarcadoolas <Christina_Zarcadoolas@brown.edu> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-HEALTH:3467] Re: Readability formulas and evaluation X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Status: O Content-Length: 1391 Lines: 34 At 10:26 AM 11/19/01 -0500, you wrote: Regarding the question about compiling a list of low lit materials where the creator of the list is not evaluating the readability of each piece, I'd create an inventory or audit sheet that each author must include with each piece. Perhaps the following could be included: Has the materials been tested with low literate readers? How ( in depth reader interviews, focus groups, etc. ) What were the results? In how many languages was the material tested? What grade level on conventional reading scores does the material test out at? THEN I'd include a required description of what other language and writing tools have been used by the authors to tailor to low lit readers. I'd have them describe in detail what characterizes the language of the piece or I'd create another audit sheet with elements such as: Does the piece have strategic repetition? Are all difficult words explained on the page? How have complex sentences been unpacked? Is there adequate cohesion between and across sentences? How does the layout reinforce it's readability? How do graphics reinforce the print? Is the piece culturally appropriate for low lit users in XXXlanguage? These are just a few things a compiler can ask authors to do to bolster their claims that the text is actually suitable for low literate audiences. Just some thoughts. Christina
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 11:28:44 EST