[NIFL-HEALTH:3613] Who's on the List? Survey results

From: Dwyoho@aol.com
Date: Mon Mar 11 2002 - 11:00:04 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g2BG03u00429; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 11:00:04 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 11:00:04 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <157.a4d1282.29be2dfb@aol.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: Dwyoho@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-health@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-HEALTH:3613] Who's on the List? Survey results
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 121
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_157.a4d1282.29be2dfb_boundary"
Status: O
Content-Length: 15060
Lines: 236

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Members who have been on the list at least since Thanksgiving 2001 will 
recall an attempt by this moderator to survey "Who's on this list?" conducted 
in December-January-February.  I am finally able to offer some results.

This should be regarded as an attempt to take a "snapshot" of a moving 
target, since the list changes every day.  In order to avoid the issue of 
semantics and the problem of wide disparity from place to place vis a vis job 
titles, degrees, etc., the survey was conducted by offering a long list of 
nouns and adjectives that might describe what participants do, where, and 
with whom.  Responders chose as many of the words to describe themselves as 
they felt appropriate.  Accordingly, percentage results should not be added 
together.

This report will reflect a good deal of personal observation and speculation 
on my part.  Hopefully the reader can separate facts from my opinions.

There were a total of 68 individuals responding.

40% or more selected the following descriptors:
       full-time:  70.5%
       Adults (work with) 54%
       local level:  47%
       public:  44%
       health professional:  40%
       writers/editors:  40%

20-35% selected the following descriptors:
       hospital:  35%
       public health:  31%
       consultant:  29%
       private:  29%
       university:  26%  
       literacy professional:  25%     
       state level:  25%
       library:  25%
       children (work with:  25%
       seniors work with):  25%
       women (work with) 22%
       coordinator:  20.5%
       Patient educator:  20.5%

9-18% selected the following descriptors:
       part-time:  19%
       national level :  18%
       men (work with) 18%
       English language (ESL, ESOL)  16%
       RN's  15%
       Publishing:  13%
       Adult Ed:  13%   
       Youth  13%
       Diabetes  12%
       Cardiac  10%
       Cancer  9%
       
The following descriptors were selected by 5 individuals or fewer.  I have 
indicated exactly how many individuals chose each descriptor:

       Clinicians  5
       Librarians  5
       MDs  4
       Social workers  4
       Dieticians  4
       Social service agency as location:  4
       Faith-based  3
       Children's literacy  3
       Migrants  3
       Fundraising  3
       Tutors  3
       Counselors 2
       Therapists  2
       Mental health setting  2
       Corrections  2
       Church location  2
       HIV  1
       Homeless  1
       K-12 School location  1
       Rehabilitation specialist  1
       Allied health  1

In addition, 4 individuals spontaneously added "researcher", which 
unfortunately was not included in the list of choices.  

Professional background/training:  Responders were asked to include their 
degrees and/or certification in their answers.  Many did not.  Therefore, I 
shall just list the degrees/certifications that were offered.  NOTE:  Should 
the reader desire to know what certain initials stand for, please ask the 
list, as I may not know. I have listed the item as it was given to me:  

MPH, MSW, BS (Psych), MS (education), Ph.D., M.Ed.,  AS in Nursing, BS in 
Nursing,  CRRN, M in Lib. Science, MLIS (M of Lib. and Info Sci.), MS in 
Nursing, Ph.D. (adult Ed),  MD,  Nurse Doctorate,  RN,  "journalism 
background", BSW, RD, CNAA, MSH, LD/N,  EdS (Pharm). , BCPS, MAT, BA 
(communication studies),  MS (exercise physiology), BS (general dietetics), 
BSD (human services), BA (health sciences), CHES,  CPNP,  RRT, M.Ed. 
(reading), OTR/L, Doctor of Public Health (Dr.PH),  MA, Certified Family and 
Consumer Scientist, graduate certificate (gerontology), 

Conclusions:  This informal poll obviously demonstrates above all that 
individuals interested in health literacy are a profoundly diverse group, 
more diverse than I expected.  Nearly everyone works in more than one 
setting, wearing more than one hat. Individuals working primarily in eduction 
and literacy as opposed to health are in a decided minority, as are 
individuals who work only part-time.  Every person who offered their 
degree/background is college-educated.  Personally, I was surprised at how 
many chose "writer/editor"; for me, this explains why there seems to be more 
discussion about writing easy-to-read than other aspect of health literacy.

I shall also report that every individual gave me their name, and usually 
their address/phone.  Thank you for your trust.   If you would like to 
connect privately with an individual or group (example:  who are the RNs on 
the list?) I will provide this information AFTER FIRST CHECKING WITH THE 
INDIVIDUALS AS TO WHETHER OR NOT S/HE WANTS HIS/HER NAME RELEASED PRIVATELY 
TO THE INQUIRER.    I will release no name to the list as a whole under any 
circumstance.  However, if I am swamped with requests of this nature I may 
have to withdraw the offer.  But I'd thought I'd suggest it in the interest 
of deepening your professional contact and the benefit of being a list 
member. 

Suggestion:  I thought it might be fun to extend this line of inquiry by 
inviting list members who responded to be "interviewed" by the list, to share 
more details of what s/he does and/or to share ideas, opinions, best 
practices, experience.  In effect, rather than bring in "outside" people as 
"guests", we can "get to know each other" better. If you like this idea, 
please give me some encouragement.  If anyone wants to volunteer to be 
"interviewed", please contact me off-list.  I have in mind inviting list 
members to send you questions to your private email during a specified time 
period, not to the list.  Then you would respond as you wish to the list, 
during a specified time frame.  You would not be responding as an "expert" in 
anything, only offering what you think may be helpful.    
    
Deborah W. Yoho
Executive Director, Greater Columbia Literacy Council
Co-Moderator, NIFL-Health Discussion Group
921 Woodrow Street
Columbia, SC  29205
803-765-2555  Fax:  803-799-8417  dwyoho@aol.com
Agency email:  litcola@mail.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:41:30 EST