Return-Path: <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f6OHcff03637; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:38:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:38:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <d3.18023447.288f0b94@aol.com> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: DEmiko18@aol.com To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-LD:3570] Scan and Read Program X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Status: O Content-Length: 556 Lines: 5 I hope this is the correct address to send this e-mail to. I've seen several postings on this chat group for the Scan and Read Program. I'm familiar with WYNN and Kurzweil 3000, two other scan and read programs for people with learning disabilities (I personally prefer WYNN), but I hadn't heard of Scan and Read until now. Does anyone have experience with using Scan and Read with students with learning disabilities or have any feedback about how it compares to WYNN and Kurzweil 3000 from a user perspective? Thanks, Denise Gibbs, Resource Teacher
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 11:28:00 EST