[NIFL-LD:3648] Re: No support for Phonetic awareness as

From: AWilder106@aol.com
Date: Wed Oct 24 2001 - 09:10:04 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f9ODA4026818; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 09:10:04 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 09:10:04 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <fd.e04c2de.2908175c@aol.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: AWilder106@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-LD:3648] Re: No support for Phonetic awareness as
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Mac - Post-GM sub 146
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Status: O
Content-Length: 488
Lines: 14

ear Clif,

Apparently good readers do not sound out words they read as they read them, 
it is automatic, the patterns are so engrained.  I do not believe it is 
correct to say good readers go directly to meaning.  This is the point of the 
eye studies.

I believe "phonetic patterns" refers to consistency between sets of symbols 
and sounds, like the consistent sound of "tch."  

I have used the Wilson method, a symplified OG method, with dyslexic students 
to good effect.  

Andrea 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 11:28:02 EST