[NIFL-LD:3702] reading IS comprehension

From: LELemke@aol.com
Date: Sat Nov 03 2001 - 14:58:33 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id fA3JwX024182; Sat, 3 Nov 2001 14:58:33 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 14:58:33 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <f2.1164e246.2915a57d@aol.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: LELemke@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-LD:3702] reading IS comprehension
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Mac sub 36
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Status: O
Content-Length: 1891
Lines: 47


In a message dated 10/30/01 3:27:36 PM, levesqjr@webster.edu writes:

<< Clif,
Regarding your statement:
Comprehension however is not part of reading. Comprehension is ones ability
to understand information. Reading is a means of accessing the information
that is then understood.

I really must disagree. Comprehension is both a process and product of
reading. If
you look at any theoretical explanation of reading you will find
comprehension to
be a critical attribute. Take a look at the International Reading 
Association's
stance on reading and you'll find comprehension inherent in the
definition of
reading.  This contradicts a position that calling out, or sounding out words
without comprehending the meaning and use of the word is not reading.
I've taught
reading methods classes at the graduate and undergraduate level for
nearly two
decades - methodologies go in and out of fashion - but comprehension
stays fixed
as the inherent goal of reading. Look back at work by Durkin in the 80's
-- she
criticized teachers for testing but not teaching comprehension. Why?
Because it
involves all of the complex reading processes. This is one reason people keep
pointing out that we have yet to find the Holy Grail of teaching
methods. One
approach does not fit all learners. Phonemic awareness, phonological
understanding, word analysis, vocabulary, listening, speaking, writing, and
reading together in concert constitute literacy. Rather than dwell on
"where did
the reading difficulty come from?" reading teachers concentrate on using
a variety
of strategies to first prevent reading difficulties. Of course they work to
remediate difficulties too. Take a look at the Snow et al study by the 
National
Research Council available at no cost at http://ed.gov/pubs

Jeri Levesque, Ed.D.
Associate Professor, Webster University
Director, Webster University Literacy Center
St. Louis, MO



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 11:28:03 EST