[NIFL-LD:3780] Re: Deaf, communication issues

From: KathleenBombach@aol.com
Date: Sun Nov 18 2001 - 15:52:33 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id fAIKqX005661; Sun, 18 Nov 2001 15:52:33 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 15:52:33 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <2d.144639b1.292978b0@aol.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: KathleenBombach@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-LD:3780] Re: Deaf, communication issues
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 10021
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_2d.144639b1.292978b0_boundary"
Status: O
Content-Length: 3160
Lines: 47

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Steve:
I found some information on teaching reading and writing to the deaf as a 
second language, which I think is a shorthand way of describing what happens 
when deaf ways of cognition and language use are understood and worked with 
rather than against in curriculum and instruction, at various deaf websites I 
found by using a search engine.  I looked at the websites that deaf 
themselves had created, including those of their associations and groups.

Deaf are the only people who are not allowed to develop their own languages 
spontaneously and historically.  But of course, deaf do so anyway.  Who are 
we to tell them what language they must speak?  Most deaf do want to know how 
to communicate and function in the hearing world, hence the notion of 
learning to read and write in English.  

But why teach Signed Exact English, an artificial language created by hearing 
people, to deaf to communicate with other deaf people?  Is this not the most 
egregious example of language imperialism possible?  To teach a sign language 
that does not mirror deaf cognition, but instead mirrors that of hearing 
people?

It reminds me of the Indian boarding schools, where children were removed 
from their own cultures to not just learn the white man's language and body 
of 'knowledge' but to actually eradicate non-white ways of thinking.

Kathleen Bombach



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 11:28:05 EST