[NIFL-LD:3836] RE: NIFL-LD:3810 NO Support for phonetic

From: AWilder106@aol.com
Date: Tue Jan 15 2002 - 15:37:59 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g0FKbx022645; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 15:37:59 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 15:37:59 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <16d.72bd579.2975ecef@aol.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: AWilder106@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-LD:3836] RE: NIFL-LD:3810 NO Support for phonetic
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Mac - Post-GM sub 146
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Status: O
Content-Length: 869
Lines: 20

Clif,

I don't know what you are disagreeing with me about.

If it is about experience, everyone draws from their own experience, no one 
is a tabula rasa in front of a new student.  Experience covers just that, 
what a person has lived through, learned, seen, all of it.  Unexamined 
experience can cause projection.  Identification is different, as I 
described.  Art draws from his experience with TBI--as well as other 
experiences.  You draw from your experience with a disability in reading and 
writing, as well as the other experiences you have described.  You also make 
use of your wife's experience.

I did not challenge you about phonetic awareness, TBI, abuse, low 
functioning, or perception deficits.

In this kind of conversation words are extremely slippery and can easily be 
used as cannon fodder when the writer meant nothing of the sort.  

Andrea



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:41:13 EST