[NIFL-LD:3849] RE: NIFL-LD:3810 NO Support for phonetic

From: Woods (woods@ncia.net)
Date: Fri Jan 18 2002 - 10:32:37 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g0IFWb024476; Fri, 18 Jan 2002 10:32:37 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 10:32:37 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <000d01c1a034$cf3eafa0$9c82f3ce@DeepThought>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Woods" <woods@ncia.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-LD:3849] RE: NIFL-LD:3810 NO Support for phonetic
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
Status: O
Content-Length: 1218
Lines: 27

Art LaChance wrote:
> We've all taught students who just never got it.  But why didn't they get
it?
> They could do a bunch of other stuff, ...

I've come to the conclusion that everyone gets something, but when they
don't get what we want them to get, then we say there must be something
wrong with them, or something must be broken. They must have a disability.
Our expectations form one side of the coin. Students' success at meeting
our expectations forms the other side. So often we consider only the latter
when we talk about learning disabilities; the former is equally important.

> One question that we need to answer is why is it that a high percentage of
LD
> kids are of above average "intelligence".

If we're talking strict legal definitions of LD as per the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act, normal or above normal intelligence is part of
the definition of LD, isn't it? In other words, you have to have normal or
above normal intelligence in order to be considered LD. If you have low
intelligence, it's a different disability (or you have none at all). So
maybe the reason we see a high percentage of LD kids with above average
intelligence is because of the way we have defined LD.

Tom



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:41:13 EST