[NIFL-LD:3952] RE: The ceiling effect

From: Marie Doerner (mdoerner@sdccd.cc.ca.us)
Date: Sun Mar 17 2002 - 13:30:01 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g2HIU1u16829; Sun, 17 Mar 2002 13:30:01 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 13:30:01 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <72B48E6344C1D511B83D00805FA70F376A114D@ntxdistrict.sdccd.cc.ca.us>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: Marie Doerner <mdoerner@sdccd.cc.ca.us>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-LD:3952] RE: The ceiling effect
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Type: text/plain;
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2654.89)
Status: O
Content-Length: 3842
Lines: 97

 If i believed in the ceiling, I would have a difficult time working hard to
teach students. So I don't believe. However, I work with students to
estimate time to learn. If we expect , based on previous history ,
standardized testing and teacher input, that learning will take an extended
period. We discuss vocational training opportunities that could go hand in
hand with literacy training.

My rule of thumb goes like this

reading level K-2       learning letters and sounds and sight words

reading level 3-5       extending vocabulary, learning comprehension skills
(mostly concrete), working on fluency, extending sight words

Up till 5th grade level the student is learning to read. From there the job
is reading to learn

reading level6+     continued from 3-5 but include abstract comprehension,
abstract inference, abstract analysis and synthesis of ideas.

Many students have difficulty with abstraction and that is why they get
stuck. I teach students about abstraction and we practice. This has worked
fairly successfully at our school. 

Marie Doerner
San Diego Community College    

-----Original Message-----
From: john.makay@excite.com
To: Multiple recipients of list
Sent: 3/14/02 12:44 PM
Subject: [NIFL-LD:3950] The ceiling effect

Dear Barbara, 

Thank you for being so prompt in answering my letter. I am a bit
reluctant to post at times. The tone is often so academic, and I feel a
bit inferior with some of my questions. Yet, I have found the meaningful
dialogue and occasional "ruffling of feathers" the spice of the
list.serv and thus quite engaging as a learning vehicle most needed for
educators and policy makers. Personally, I have learned a great deal in
the last three days. This list.serv has answered questions that I have
pondered at great length, questions that for years have gone unanswered
through channels in my traditional learning community. . . . getting
back to my question. 

I am asking about a "ceiling effect" (first mentioned by Clif) where
adult students with dyslexia tend to reach a limit of a 5.9 grade level
in reading. If Clif's assumption is correct, this has great implications
for programming in literacy education across the country. In other
words, it seems to support a model where reading instruction must be
tempered with accomodation at a certain point in the education cycle of
some of our students. As Clif points out . . . all students with normal
comprehension abilities should have the opportunity to go to college or
pursue other life and work choices that formally required a high level
of literacy. 

Please don't misinterpret my meaning here. I find literacy a valid goal
as most of the industrialized world functions under this paradigm, but
possibly, this goal should not be our only focus. This thought might be
frightening for some. 

So, again I ask you to help me get to the bottom of this. I understand
that many have had great success getting some students to a very high
level using OT and other phonics based methods. In fact, in your
message, you mentioned that you had success with some individuals in
reading and spelling where students were reading on a twelfth grade
level. Yet, my question remains unanswered. Does a "ceiling effect"
actually exist for a specific group of students, and if so, how many
fall into this catagory. What common characteristics do these students
have? 

Barbara, thank you again for giving me some leads. Yet, I open up this
question again. If anyone has experiential or research-based information
to this effect, please, let us look at it carefully together. 

Thank you for helping me to establish the ground rules. 

John 

John Makay 
ESL Instructor 
Baltimore City Community College 
600 E. Lombard St. 
Baltimore, MD 21214 
(410) 986-5430 








  _____  

 <<Research on the ceiling effect adults with dyslexia>> 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:41:15 EST