[NIFL-LD:4013] Re: Readability

• Next message: Art LaChance: "[NIFL-LD:4014] Re: Readability"
• Previous message: Art LaChance: "[NIFL-LD:4012] Re: Readability"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Return-Path: <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g6MGocX10424; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 12:50:38 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 12:50:38 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <1a0.5a011f1.2a6d911a@aol.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: AWilder106@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-LD:4013] Re: Readability
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Mac - Post-GM sub 146
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Status: O
Content-Length: 151
Lines: 7

Art,

I just love this method because it sounds so impromptu but isn't, how long 
have you used this technique?

Have others used similar techniques?

• Next message: Art LaChance: "[NIFL-LD:4014] Re: Readability"
• Previous message: Art LaChance: "[NIFL-LD:4012] Re: Readability"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:41:17 EST