[NIFL-LD:4026] Re: More LD questions

From: Woods (woods@ncia.net)
Date: Thu Jul 25 2002 - 23:57:16 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g6Q3vGX07628; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 23:57:16 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 23:57:16 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <007301c23458$123bcab0$7e82f3ce@DeepThought>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Woods" <woods@ncia.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-LD:4026] Re: More LD questions
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
Status: O
Content-Length: 2827
Lines: 49

Andrea wrote:
> When you come across these reading disabilities, how do you remediate
them?
> Do you do diagnosis--what does this tell you?

I work with adults at the high school level who sometimes are poor readers.
I notice that very seldom do they ever have problems with phonics. They seem
to have learned this very well over and over again when they were in school.
Often they have very limited vocabulary. Sight words (or the lack thereof)
impede their reading. Fluency is often a problem. Memory can be troublesome
(i.e. they can understand what they read as they read it, but when you ask
them to retell or answer questions about the material, they can't
remember.). Sometimes structural analysis (i.e. breaking down big words into
little words) is a weakness. I also sometimes work with college students.
They read fairly well, but they are what I'd call passive readers. They just
let their eyes pass over the words and they don't think about what they've
read. They don't really have a reading problem, but their lack of engagement
kills them on their tests and assignments.

Do I use diagnostics? Of course. How else would we know what to do if we
don't take a careful look at exactly what the student both does and does not
do as she or he reads?

What do I do? That depends on what the student needs. I was trained to look
at reading as the balanced use of a number of different strategies. When
there is a reading problem, it's because the reader may have not learned
some strategies, or s/he has an overreliance on one strategy (i.e. it's not
balanced). The answer is to help the reader achieve balance. Through
diagnosis, you figure out what strategies are weak or missing. Then you try
to help the reader improve in those areas. There are many many practices and
techniques for the various reading strategies. Among my favorites are
language experience, repeated reading, playing Scrabble, cloze, asking and
answering as many questions as you can about a passage and
guess-the-covered-word activities. The professional journals are full of
many others.

There are a couple things I feel do NOT especially help a student who has
trouble reading. I tend to get in a lot of trouble saying it, but I don't
believe we help poor readers very much by trying to identify a cause of
their problem. dwelling on the psychological, intellectual, and emotional
processes that interfere with reading does not tell me what I need to know
to try to help the person read better. The effort would be better spent
learning about the reader's strategies and working on the areas of weakness.
There is an exception to this. Identifying the physical problem of poor
vision and correcting it can sometimes make all the difference. I can see
how this might also hold for hearing problems, but I have no experience in
that area.

Tom



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:41:17 EST