[NIFL-LD:4545] RE: Immediate vs. Long term needs

From: Glenn Young (gyoungxlt@comcast.net)
Date: Thu Dec 02 2004 - 02:08:05 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id iB2785F05177; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 02:08:05 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 02:08:05 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200412020705.iB275ZF05050@literacy.nifl.gov>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Glenn Young" <gyoungxlt@comcast.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-LD:4545] RE: Immediate vs. Long term needs
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
Status: O
Content-Length: 2698
Lines: 58

By the way ... We must not judge the overall situation by "outliers"  ....
Yes there will be people for which accommodations will not work, and those
who will take years even with accommodations ... But the bulk of those ...
Those under the center of the bell curve will benefit ... And we need to
make it happen for them ... Outliers will always be there ... But we can not
determine policy based on the outliers   


Glenn Young
505 East Braddock Rd # 608
Alexandria VA 22314
703-684-1750
gyoungxlt@comcast.net
 

-----Original Message-----
From: nifl-ld@nifl.gov [mailto:nifl-ld@nifl.gov] On Behalf Of Michele Craig
(shellcraig@ix.netcom.com)
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 6:56 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: [NIFL-LD:4544] Immediate vs. Long term needs

Gee,

We just had this debate at the photocopy machine at the adult school where I
work this morning. Also I had it with a colleague who is going to attend a
meeting tomorrow at our county social services department whose new goal is
"Everyone receiving county assistance will get their GED!" 
(Groan....this, for the social workers includes the mentally ill, the brain
injured, and those whose IQ's unfortunately will probably keep them from
ever passing the GED). What about helping them to become functional in the
workplace?

At the moment, I agree with Glenn, our job is to help the students with
their immediate needs. Sometimes though, even their immediate needs (because
unrealistic or unrealistically imposed by others) will take several years.
For example I have a coma survivor who has gone from a 4th grade math level
to a 12th grade math level in 2 years, but because of  aphasia due to the
brain injury, he will probably have a difficult time writing an essay for
the GED without some kind of accommodation (if he can even manage it). The
fact that he has stuck around for two years is a miracle, as far as I'm
concerned. Most adults in my class who find that they can't meet their
immediate needs within several months, give up. I find that an average for
my GED/ABE class is probably 6 months.

More and more I am coming to believe though, that there is nothing wrong
with a dyslexic student learning to use a Franklin speller so they can write
memos at work, or to teach someone how to do fractions on the calculator so
they can make calculations accurately. I wish that I had voice recognition
software and other technological goodies so I could show my students how to
use them, but my classroom is more like the Ewok village than the DeathStar.
And, most of my students can't afford fancy equipment and machinery even if
they did know how to use it.

Michele Craig
Woodland Adult School
Woodland, CA 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 23 2004 - 09:47:50 EST