Return-Path: <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j2A224C02345; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 21:02:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 21:02:04 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <BE550651.5C05%varshna@grandecom.net> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: Varshna Narumanchi-Jackson <varshna@grandecom.net> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-LD:4619] RE: Spanish Screen - request for help X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-type: text/plain; Status: O Content-Length: 892 Lines: 24 Glenn, Aren't you worried that such screening without appropriate follow-up might be confusing or upsetting to participants? I would wonder why I am being asked a bunch of questions if nothing comes of it. If I were to recommend this idea to some program directors, what would be a safe response to the question? Sincerely, Varshna. on 3/9/05 10:34 AM, Glenn Young at gyoungxlt@comcast.net wrote: > The only thing that would be reported from the data > collected is that the screen was administer to X number of > persons, and that Y number of persons were found to have scores > based on the screening design that indicated there could be LD. > > > If there is actually a significant finding of those at risk for LD through > this screen, it may stimulate additional research in this area. (And any > report on the findings will be filled with caveats on the whole issue.)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:49:45 EST