Return-Path: <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j2BK6eC22353; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:06:40 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:06:40 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20050311145643.00a96a40@mailserver.aecom.yu.edu> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: "Mary S. Kelly" <mskelly@aecom.yu.edu> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-LD:4633] RE: Spanish Screen - request for help X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Status: O Content-Length: 7164 Lines: 176 I have been reading postings on this list serve for years now, but haven't written in before. I feel compelled now given the discussion of a Spanish LD screen. This is a laudable, sorely needed effort. However, I agree completely with Nancie Payne that any time human beings are asked to participate in research - or data collection, or whatever name you want to give it - ethically it has to include informed consent. There are many agencies, mine included, that could be fined by the Federal government for doing research without informed consent, no matter how benign the research is. There is no reason not to tell people the exact purpose of the screen. If explained clearly, they will understand it is a needs assessment and not a promise of services. With informed consent, they can decide not to participate if they have concerns about the lack of follow up services. If you want numbers without the bother of informed consent, send questionnaires to program managers who can estimate their needs. Mary S. Kelly, PhD Director, Adult Literacy Program Fisher Landau Center for the Treatment of LD Albert Einstein College of Medicine Bronx, NY At 08:55 AM 03/11/2005 -0500, you wrote: >To Nancie and Varshna > >Prehaps research project is the wrong term ... And prehaps it is .. Maybe >you can help > >So the question is simple ... > > How many people given the screen scored "at-risk" > > Be delivered on the front line by Spanish Speaking persons > > Report would be in gross numbers -- x number of screens given ... Y >number of people scored "at" risk .. > >No other demographic or such break down ... Just trying to get some gross >numbers to start ... So we can draw attention more to the issue. > >We would run the numbers through LDA of Western New York ... And to SUNY > >I am fully aware that there is limited resources to follow-up (both money >and professionals) ... That is the problem I am trying to address with the >"research" .. And so if we can't follow-up with good diagnostics ... I don't >want to set up either the programs or consumers with expectations they can >not fulfill ... > >That is why I am suggesting that the screen be used to try and simple see >how many "score " "at risk" ... > >So perhaps this is just "data collection" rather then "research project" ... > > >I am not trying to get around "human research protocols ... But I we don't >want to put programs or people at risk for things we can not deliver ... But >we need to know what is going on .. So it a "chicken and egg" issue? > >Suggestions? thanks > >Glenn Young >505 East Braddock Rd # 608 >Alexandria VA 22314 >703-684-1750 >gyoungxlt@comcast.net > > >-----Original Message----- >From: nifl-ld@nifl.gov [mailto:nifl-ld@nifl.gov] On Behalf Of Varshna >Narumanchi-Jackson >Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 7:15 PM >To: Multiple recipients of list >Subject: [NIFL-LD:4626] RE: Spanish Screen - request for help > >Nancie and Glenn, > >Thanks for the follow-up and feedback. Glenn, could you please be more >specific about the parameters of your research project? > >What are the research questions you are testing? What protocols would you >suggest programs follow? How would you want the data reported? Who gets >the data, and how would it be analyzed? How many would constitute a >sufficient sample size? Would the results be published... > >Sorry to be obnoxious, but I think more information at the front end would >offer programs a better opportunity to evaluate the benefits of >participation. Texas has a sizable and politically active Spanish-speaking >population, so it will be necessary to weight the benefits against the risks >of engaging participants without informed consent and without backing from a >major research institution. > >Thanks, Varshna. > >on 3/10/05 5:18 PM, Nancie Payne at napayne@worldnet.att.net wrote: > > > Hi Glenn and all reading this message, > > > > Unless I read the information incorrectly I believe you must inform > > the participants in a research project that they are being involved in > > a research project and the type of project -- I believe it's called > > "Informed Consent" and it is part of the required protocols under the > > code of ethics and right to privacy process when involving human subjects. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: nifl-ld@nifl.gov [mailto:nifl-ld@nifl.gov] On Behalf Of Glenn > > Young > > Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 10:07 AM > > To: Multiple recipients of list > > Subject: [NIFL-LD:4621] RE: Spanish Screen - request for help > > > > Thanks for the question ... > > > > Since this would be anonymous ... There would be no issue for the > > program as far as follow up ... Research such as this, is often > > conducted with no implied follow-up or the participants ... Since the > > participants would not know what this is about ... There should be no > > confusion ... They can be told that this is just a survey being > > conducted on past education and other history ... For data collection ... > > > > I think there should be NO statement in anyway to the participants > > that this is a screen for learning disabilities or anything of the > > sort ... Since many of them will not know what LD is, and this would > > cause confusion, and also many may have a negative connotation of the > > term "disability" which could get a lot of false negatives ... > > > > Also .. If we told them it was a LD screen, then, your right, they > > would expect some kind of follow up ... Or want to know the results > > ... So that is why, for this purpose ... Getting some "gross" numbers, > > we need to keep it simple, and anonymous and with out participants knowing >what it is ... > > > > > > I hope this answers the question .. > > > > Glenn Young > > 505 East Braddock Rd # 608 > > Alexandria VA 22314 > > 703-684-1750 > > gyoungxlt@comcast.net > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: nifl-ld@nifl.gov [mailto:nifl-ld@nifl.gov] On Behalf Of Varshna > > Narumanchi-Jackson > > Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 8:02 PM > > To: Multiple recipients of list > > Subject: [NIFL-LD:4619] RE: Spanish Screen - request for help > > > > Glenn, > > > > Aren't you worried that such screening without appropriate follow-up > > might be confusing or upsetting to participants? I would wonder why I > > am being asked a bunch of questions if nothing comes of it. If I were > > to recommend this idea to some program directors, what would be a safe > > response to the question? > > > > Sincerely, Varshna. > > > > > > on 3/9/05 10:34 AM, Glenn Young at gyoungxlt@comcast.net wrote: > > > >> The only thing that would be reported from the data > >> collected is that the screen was administer to X number of > >> persons, and that Y number of persons were found to have scores > >> based on the screening design that indicated there could be LD. > >> > >> > >> If there is actually a significant finding of those at risk for LD > >> through this screen, it may stimulate additional research in this > >> area. (And any report on the findings will be filled with caveats on > >> the > > whole issue.) > > > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:49:46 EST