Return-Path: <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j3JEfwG10674; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:41:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:41:58 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <4659341D.3750A843.0A349A3F@aol.com> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: AWilder106@aol.com To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-LD:4720] Typology? X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0 Status: O Content-Length: 767 Lines: 16 Colleagues: I am interested in knowing how anybody on this list groups learning differences, that is, a typology, or types of LD. Probably a lot of experience comes into play, as when you see the same behaviors for the nth time, you think: There it is again, I'll try this strategy because it worked well last time. Also, different assessments produce different categories. This is a somewhat arcane point, but I was talking with a guy yesterday who brought up nld (non verbal learning differences)and he had never seen these before. Then there is the person with ADHD behaviors which vanish over time. Any thought on these topics would be very welcome. (and Anne, thank you very much for the newsletter you sent, I was tickled pink!) Thanks. Andrea
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:49:49 EST