[NIFL-LD:4772] Re: Intonation and Interpretation of Computer read text.

From: Christopher Lee (christopherlee@mindspring.com)
Date: Mon May 23 2005 - 17:00:53 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j4NL0rG29257; Mon, 23 May 2005 17:00:53 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 17:00:53 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <000d01c55fda$1a94b630$1689c080@Christopher>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "Christopher Lee" <christopherlee@mindspring.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-LD:4772] Re: Intonation and Interpretation of Computer read text.
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
Status: RO
Content-Length: 2974
Lines: 94

Michele -
do you want to set up a conference call -- thanks, Christopher Lee
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michele Anne Craig" <shellcraig@ix.netcom.com>
To: "Multiple recipients of list" <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov>
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 4:36 PM
Subject: [NIFL-LD:4771] Re: Intonation and Interpretation of Computer read 
text.


> Christopher,
>
> I would really like to hear about other AT stuff. I thought if there were
> something that would read a book as you scanned it, it would be a lot more
> useful than books on tape. For one thing, you could use it the way you
> actually read. For example, reading captions on pictures or only reading
> parts of the text. Anything you know about would be good. If others on the
> list already know about it, just email me off list.
>
> Michele
>
>
>> [Original Message]
>> From: Christopher Lee <christopherlee@mindspring.com>
>> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov>
>> Date: 5/3/2005 3:07:00 AM
>> Subject: [NIFL-LD:4758] Re: Intonation and Interpretation of Computer
> read text.
>>
>> Michele
>>
>> I would be happy to point you in the direction of other AT (assistive
>> technology) products. I also hated the audio books growing up in k-12
>>
>> Christopher Lee
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Michele Anne Craig" <shellcraig@ix.netcom.com>
>> To: "Multiple recipients of list" <nifl-ld@literacy.nifl.gov>
>> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 9:13 PM
>> Subject: [NIFL-LD:4756] Intonation and Interpretation of Computer read
> text.
>>
>>
>> > Susan,
>> >
>> > I was so glad to see your post about the drawbacks of the technology 
>> > for
>> > people if they don't have the infrastructure to support the technology.
>> > Also the thing you said about students having to reinterpret the  text
>> > into
>> > more tonal reading really struck home with me. It is the difference
>> > between
>> > the books on tape that you get from the library and the books on tape
> that
>> > you get from the Library of Congress. My son is dyslexic, and he
> recently
>> > qualified to receive talking books, but he hates them for a few reasons
> --
>> > the main one being that because the tapes are made so that you can 
>> > speed
>> > them up to listen to the book faster, the readers are instructed not to
>> > put
>> > lots of expression into the reading since this would mess up the words
>> > when
>> > you speed up the tape. They also do things like read all the beginning
> of
>> > the book -- title pages, table of contents, the whole works!
>> >
>> > Listening to one of these almost atonal books is not at all the
> experience
>> > of having someone read to you or hearing a professional actor read. I
>> > think
>> > that it would take a lot of training to learn to use these books in how
>> > you
>> > listen. Just as you read for different purposes -- I guess you listen
> for
>> > different purposes too.
>> >
>> > Michele
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
> 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:49:50 EST