[NIFL-POVRACELIT:292] Dialogues in Literacy

From: GEORGE E. DEMETRION (gdemetrion@juno.com)
Date: Wed Nov 22 2000 - 20:41:20 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id eAN1fK929136; Wed, 22 Nov 2000 20:41:20 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 20:41:20 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20001122.203307.12030.1.GDEMETRION@juno.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: "GEORGE E. DEMETRION" <gdemetrion@juno.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-POVRACELIT:292] Dialogues in Literacy
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: Juno 1.49
Status: O
Content-Length: 10423
Lines: 186

I wrote this in 1995 in a collection of interviews that Allison Gruner
and I edited.  What follows is the afterward, which speaks of some of the
issues raised in my discussions with Anne Murr.

George Demetrion


Afterword

The students interviewed in Dialogues in Literacy have expressed a wide
range of reasons on why they are participating in the program, on what
they are achieving and the hopes and expectations that they have on how
literacy may change their lives.  Their views are expressed overtly in
many concrete ways as is evident in even a casual reading of this text. I
briefly addressed some of these ways in the introduction.  In this
concluding piece I will touch upon an area alluded to in the interviews
which is one of the most important and understudied issues in the field
of adult literacy.  This is the relationship students make both
explicitly and implicitly between basic skill development and reading for
meaning.  
	
In its new manual, Tutor:  A Collaborative Approach to Literacy
Instruction, 7th edition (Cheatham, Colvin, and Laminack, 1993), Literacy
Volunteers of America (LVA) has fully embraced a whole language approach
to literacy.  Specifically, LVA has defined literacy as making meaning
through the world of print by bringing personal knowledge to bear in
understanding relevant texts and in constructing new texts by drawing on
personal experience and knowledge.  On this view, literacy is essentially
a communicative process and incorporates speech as well as print for the
purpose of obtaining relevant information and knowledge as defined by the
subjects of such learning; the students themselves.  
	
This view contrasts vividly with a traditional, "bottom-up" approach
which defines reading essentially as a decoding process through
increasing mastery of phonetic clues and sight word memorization.  The
content of learning on this view is subordinated to skill development and
often lacks any intrinsic meaning to a real reader.  
	
To bring this distinction out in its  starkest and perhaps stereotypical
way, consider the following passages in two very basic texts that are
premised on radically different views of literacy:

"Sam wanted to go fishing but he had no fishing pole.  He saw an ad in
the paper.  It said "Fishing Pole for Sale-bait free if you buy a fishing
pole" (Root, 1976, p.27)."

The "story line" continues on the next several pages where we learn among
other things that "Sam took the bus to the store" which was "next to the
firehouse" where he bought a fishing pole.  The purpose of this lesson is
to teach the "F" and "S" sounds for which the text was artificially
created.  There is in fact, no story at all in the sense of an
imaginative narrative with real characters grounded in actual time and
place.  Neither is there a situation to speak of that can sustain any
serious interest or evoke any sense of curiosity and wonder.  This text,
in essence, represents the antithesis of meaning making and it was
selected to illustrate the basic skill approach in its most extreme
decontextualized format.
	
The next passage is premised on the whole language view of literacy and
its sole purpose is to evoke the "thought-world" and the creative
imagination of the reader:

"I remember when I was little my mother used to read to us.  I don't know
why I didn't catch on like my sisters and brothers.  I used to cry myself
to sleep (Smith, 1991, 57)."

This poignant passage is part of a broader narrative titled The Crying
Heart where the anonymous but very real author describes the intense
emotional pain that she experienced in not being able to read as a child.
 She ends with a plea for children to learn while in school so that they
would not have to undergo the suffering which she has been forced to
endure.  The entire passage, moreover, is part of an anthology titled
Welcome To Our World:  A Book Of Writings By And For Students And Their
Tutors (Smith, 1991).  This is a text replete with stimulating and often
emotionally heartwrenching narratives whereby adult new readers share
authentic life experiences grounded in person, place, and plot.  These
types of texts are used extensively throughout LVGH to foster basic
literacy development.  They evoke considerable discussion whereby
students respond and often recount related experiences which sometimes
become the source of new texts.  
	
In such a learning climate, meaning making is reinforced as a critical
aspect of becoming literate.  At the same time, there is also an emphasis
on basic skill development in the Reading Center program at LVGH.  Words
are identified for phonic analysis and sight word memorization and
spelling are often major concerns.  The difference between the whole
language from the traditional approach, according to the authors of Tutor
7, is that basic skill work emerges from a meaningful context of literacy
usage.  In our experience at the Reading Center, however, the reality is
more complex than the very coherent and attractive model recently
developed by LVA.
	
In the interviews, students often articulate the common sense notion that
their primary purpose is to learn to read, and what they read is less
important than in obtaining general literacy skills.  Brian Street
interprets such a "decontextual" understanding as the "autonomous" view
of literacy.  Yet, on my reading of the situation, students upon entering
the program may have a diffusive sense of the value of literacy, but it
is far from decontextual.  Rather, they typically begin with a general
notion that becoming increasingly literate is an invaluable skill for
living in a complex urban environment and that the mastery of the various
decoding skills plays an essential role in any such attainment.  As they
become immersed in the program more refined interpretations of literacy
often emerge, as Susan Lytle states; including the relationship between
reading and writing and specific knowledge that students find meaningful.
 Yet, even as students make the transition from learning to read to
reading in order to learn, they still place a high level of importance on
refining their basic decoding skills.
	
Thus, in the "real world" of adult literacy provision, reading and
writing for meaning and basic skill development are simultaneously held
within the minds of students and teachers alike in varying relationships
and combinations.  Students and tutors alike work with this issue
pragmatically through experiential approaches, for the purpose of moving
learning forward in any ways that they can.
	
The challenge for literacy programs is to assist students in making
connections between general literacy development and reading for meaning
and purpose.  The interviews indicate how this has happened in
innumerable ways.  What most commonly takes place is that students
discover a world of learning that in many respects had been previously
closed. They find that through literacy that they can learn in formal
school-like ways and that such learning becomes a powerful source of
intrinsic motivation for many.  In the process, the quest for basic skill
mastery and reading for specific purposes typically remains entwined for
students at all different levels.  What also seems clear is that higher
level students read more specifically for content while lower level
students express more diffusiveness in their objectives.  Even the
latter, however, are interested in more than basic skill mastery and
often engage in vigorous discussion on the topics of particular lessons. 

	
Yet as the interviews bring out, those students at a higher stage of
literacy development have identified more discriminating reasons for
reading.  They begin to read and write for specific purposes and as a
result, their perception of literacy or what Lytle refers to as "beliefs"
becomes more sophisticated.  In stating this they do not disregard the
importance of skill work, but contextualize it as an integral part of
reading for meaning.  As one advanced student stated it at the end of his
interview, "I want to comprehend and read better [in general] and I'm
hungry for knowledge."  
	
Another advanced student identified several powerful content areas that
she wanted to master, including the Bible, reading correspondence from
her child's school, filling out forms, obtaining a GED, reading for
pleasure and obtaining her nurse's aide certification.  Clearly, this
student reads for specific purposes and her objectives have become
increasingly refined throughout her learning history at the Reading
Center.  Yet, she also attributes a high degree of importance to correct
spelling which she identifies as a major "weak" area.  As she assesses
the situation, "I have to really start getting my spelling together if I
want to get a job and to fill out applications."
	
What the interviews disclose is that the world of print is opening up to
new adult readers in a broad array of creative and fascinating ways. 
Discriminations that adult literacy educators make between whole language
and basic skill approaches are not part of their "thought-world." 
Engaging literacy as a meaning-making process is inevitable as each
person needs to make sense of this in ways that conform to the radical
particularity of his or her own learning style and inclination.  In
general, it is reasonable to assume that as students become increasingly
proficient there is more of a tendency to read in order to learn rather
than learning to read as an end in itself.  Yet, the relationship between
these two dimensions of reading remains highly complex and
interdependent.  We know little yet, of how such interaction actually
works, but the students interviewed in this book point to its importance.


REFERENCES

Cheatham, J.B,Colvin, R.J., and Laminack, L.L. (1993).  Tutor:  A
Collaborative Approach to Literacy Instruction. Seventh Edition.
Syracuse, NY:  Literacy Volunteers of America, Inc.

Lytle, S.L. "Living Literacy:  Rethinking Development in Adulthood." 
Linguistics and Education, 3, 109-138.

Root, J.H. (1976).  Read On!  Basic Reading for Adults and Teens. Book
One.  Syracuse, NY:  Literacy Volunteers of America, Inc.

Smith, S.W. (1991).  Welcome To Our World: A Book Of Writings By And For
Students And Their Tutors.  Hartford, CT:  Literacy Volunteers of Greater
Hartford

Street, B.V. (1984).  Literacy Into Theory and Practice.  Cambridge,
England:  Cambridge University Press.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jan 16 2001 - 14:47:29 EST