[NIFL-POVRACELIT:706] Re: Literacy Rates and Reality

From: JATDP@aol.com
Date: Sat Feb 02 2002 - 13:04:47 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g12I4lu16590; Sat, 2 Feb 2002 13:04:47 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 13:04:47 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <16c.82ab825.298d8385@aol.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: JATDP@aol.com
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-povracelit@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-POVRACELIT:706] Re: Literacy Rates and Reality
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 138
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Status: O
Content-Length: 1442
Lines: 33

Mathew,
I totally agree with your analysis and would go one step further...I'm not 
even sure there is an intention to 'bridge racial and economic gaps' but a 
wish to impose a particular educational philosophy across the board. 

there also seems to be a huge un-named elephant in the adult basic education 
room, so to speak. It seems incredable that the years of hard dialog around 
multicultural, antiracism education in K-12 and higher ed doesn't seem to 
have seeped into adult ed discussions, at least not where I've hung out. 
Adult ed does seem to attrack it's share of 'us old hippies' with community 
organizing backgrounds who are willing to bring class analysis to the table. 
Yet....

 I know that some folks in the New Orleans area have posted their efforts to 
move the race/class discussion into public adult ed forums. I truly hope this 
is a sign that these critical issues are truly part of 
dialog/reflection/action in many more corners of adult ed. Hopefully others 
doing this work will post on this list.

Judy Titzel
Providence, RI

<< 
 It summarizes my growing feeling that much of the talk about leaving no 
 child behind (a nifty trademark infringement on the Children's Defense 
 Fund, by the way) is a very smooth way to talk about bridging racial and 
 economic gaps without managing to talk about race or class.  Anyone else 
 have this impression?
 
 Peace,
 Matthew Scelza
 California Literacy, Inc.  
  >>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:46:05 EST